Cited by 73Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Effect of dietary tannins on milk yield and composition, nitrogen partitioning and nitrogen use efficiency of lactating dairy cows: a meta-analysis

Herremans, Sophie, Vanwindekens, Frédéric, Decruyenaere, Virginie, Beckers, Yves, Froidmont, Eric·2020·Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition

Abstract

Tannins are secondary plant compounds which have been extensively studied in order to improve the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of ruminants. A meta-analysis was performed of 58 in vivo experiments comparing milk yield, composition and nitrogen metabolism of lactating dairy cows fed diets with or without tannins. The meta-analysis shows that tannins have no impact on corrected milk yield, fat and protein content or NUE (p > .05). However, tannins reduce ruminal ammoniacal nitrogen (N) production by 16% (from 10.95 to 8.47 mg/dl on average), milk urea by 9% (from 15.82 to 14.03 mg/dl) and urinary N excretion (-11%; p < .05). This is compensated for by a lower apparent N digestibility (61.51% with dietary tannins compared to 66.17% without). The effect of tannin on N metabolism parameters increases with tannin dose (p < .05). The shift from urinary to faecal N may be beneficial for environment preservation, as urinary N induces more harmful emissions than faecal N. From a farmer's perspective, tannins seem unable to increase fat- and protein-corrected milk yield or reduce feed protein requirements and thus have no direct economic benefit. Potentially less costly than tannin extracts, forage or by-products naturally rich in tannins could still be useful to reduce the environmental impact of ruminant protein feeding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jpn.13341

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herremans, S., Vanwindekens, F., Decruyenaere, V., Beckers, Y., & Froidmont, E.
Affiliations
  • Walloon Agricultural Research Centre (BE)
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Production and Sectors Department Walloon Agricultural Research Center Gembloux Belgium
Corresponding author
Herremans, Sophie
Venue
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-03-12
Volume
104
Issue
5
Pages
1209-1218
ISSN
  • 0931-2439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0396
OpenAlex
W3012130188
Cited by
73
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Keywords
dietary tannins, nitrogen use efficiency, nitrogen partitioning, lactating dairy cows, milk yield, milk composition, rumen ammonia, milk urea nitrogen, urinary nitrogen excretion, apparent nitrogen digestibility, environmental impact of livestock
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Cattle, Diet, Female, Lactation, Milk, Nitrogen, Tannins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review