Cited by 54Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyUrological Disorders and Treatments

Sexual functioning in military personnel: preliminary estimates and predictors

Wilcox, Sherrie L., Redmond, Sarah, Hassan, Anthony M.·2014·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although the military is a young and vigorous force, service members and veterans may experience sexual functioning problems (SFPs) as a result of military service. Sexual functioning can be impaired by physical, psychological, and social factors and can impact quality of life (QOL) and happiness. AIMS: This study aims to estimate rates and correlates of SFPs in male military personnel across demographic and psychosocial characteristics, to examine the QOL concomitants, and to evaluate barriers for treatment seeking. METHODS: This exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted using data from a larger nationwide study conducted between October 2013 and November 2013. This sample consists of 367 male active duty service members and recent veterans (military personnel) age 40 or younger. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Erectile dysfunction (ED) was determined using the five-item International Index of Erectile Function, sexual dysfunction (SD) was determined using the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale, Male, and QOL was determined using the World Health Organization Quality of Life, Brief. RESULTS: SFPs were associated with various demographic, physical, and psychosocial risk factors. The rates of SD and ED were 8.45% and 33.24%, respectively, for male military personnel aged 21-40. Those who were 36-40, nonmarried, nonwhite, and of lower educational attainment reported the highest rates of SFPs. Male military personnel with poor physical and psychosocial health presented the greatest risk for ED and SD. SFPs were associated with reduced QOL and lower happiness, and barriers for treatment were generally related to social barriers. CONCLUSIONS: SFPs in young male military personnel are an important public health concern that can severely impact QOL and happiness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsm.12643

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilcox, S. L., Redmond, S., & Hassan, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Wilcox, Sherrie L.
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2014-10-01
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
2537-2545
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W1926419804
Cited by
54
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
California Community Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
sexual dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, military personnel, veterans, quality of life, happiness, barriers to treatment, risk factors, psychosocial health, young men, sexual health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Happiness, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Military Personnel, Quality of Life, Risk, Risk Factors, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Veterans, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review