Cited by 79Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Associations among experiential avoidance, couple adjustment, and interpersonal aggression in returning Iraqi war veterans and their partners

Reddy, Madhavi K., Meis, Laura A., Erbes, Christopher R., Polusny, Melissa A., Compton, Jill S.·2011·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to examine the role of experiential avoidance (EA) in relationship adjustment, psychological aggression, and physical aggression among military couples. METHOD: The sample was composed of 49 male soldiers who recently returned from deployment to Iraq and their female partners. As part of a larger study, participants completed self-report measures of emotional avoidance (EA; Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II), relationship adjustment (Dyadic Adjustment Scale), and conflict (Conflict Tactics Scale-2). Data from men and women were simultaneously modeled with the actor-partner interdependence model. RESULTS: Men's EA was associated with decreases in relationship adjustment and increases in physical aggression perpetration and victimization. For women, relationship adjustment was not associated with EA, but greater EA among women was associated with decreased relationship adjustment for male partners. Associations among EA and psychological aggression were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence that EA may play a critical role in the relationships of couples following deployment and highlight the importance of targeting EA in couple therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023929

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reddy, M. K., Meis, L. A., Erbes, C. R., Polusny, M. A., & Compton, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Minneapolis VA Medical Center (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2011-08
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
515-520
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2006835030
Cited by
79
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Lilly Endowment, Inc (2007 1325-000)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
experiential avoidance, emotional avoidance, couple adjustment, interpersonal aggression, physical aggression, psychological aggression, military couples, Iraq War, conflict, actor-partner interdependence, couple therapy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aggression, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Adjustment, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Couples Therapy, Iraq War, 2003-2011

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review