Cited by 25Electromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsSleep and Wakefulness ResearchTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of evening exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by 3G mobile phones on health and night sleep EEG architecture

Lowden, Arne, Nagai, Roberta, Åkerstedt, Torbjörn, Hansson Mild, Kjell, Hillert, Lena·2019·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

Studies on sleep after exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields have shown mixed results. We investigated the effects of double‐blind radiofrequency exposure to 1,930–1,990 MHz, UMTS 3G signalling standard, time‐averaged 10 g specific absorption rate of 1.6 W kg−1 on self‐evaluated sleepiness and objective electroencephalogram architecture during sleep. Eighteen subjects aged 18–19 years underwent 3.0 hr of controlled exposure on two consecutive days 19:45–23:00 hours (including 15‐min break); active or sham prior to sleep, followed by full‐night 7.5 hr polysomnographic recordings in a sleep laboratory. In a cross‐over design, the procedure was repeated a week later with the second condition. The results for sleep electroencephalogram architecture showed no change after radiofrequency exposure in sleep stages compared with sham, but power spectrum analyses showed a reduction of activity within the slow spindle range (11.0–12.75 Hz). No differences were found for self‐evaluated health symptoms, performance on the Stroop colour word test during exposure or for sleep quality. These results confirm previous findings that radiofrequency post‐exposure in the evening has very little influence on electroencephalogram architecture but possible on spindle range activity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.12813

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lowden, A., Nagai, R., Åkerstedt, T., Hansson Mild, K., & Hillert, L.
Affiliations
  • Stress Research Institute Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Department of Radiation Sciences Radiation Physics Umeå University Umeå Sweden
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-15
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
e12813-e12813
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W2909127077
Cited by
25
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Faculty of Arts and Sciences (2009‐0704)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, 3G mobile phones, sleep spindles, specific absorption rate, sleep quality, sleepiness, Stroop task, cognitive performance, health symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Electromagnetic Fields, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep Wake Disorders, Sleep Stages, Cross-Over Studies, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review