Cited by 10Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPhysical Activity and Health

Impact of sleep and physical activity habits on real-life glycaemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Gauthier, Pierre, Desir, Chesner, Plombas, Maud, Joffray, Eloïse, Benhamou, Pierre‐Yves, Borel, Anne‐Laure·2023·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

The aim of this study was to better characterise whether sleep habits, eating schedule and physical activity in real-life are associated with glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 28 patients (aged 60 years [58; 66], 54% female) with type 2 diabetes treated with basal-bolus insulin therapy administered by insulin pumps were analysed. Glycaemic data measured by Flash Glucose Monitor System, physical activity and sleep data measured by accelerometer, and meal schedules were simultaneously collated with insulin pump administration data, for 7 days in real-life. Their respective impact on the time spent in target, in hypoglycaemia, in hyperglycaemia and on glycaemic variability was evaluated. Multiple regressions showed that the total daily dose of meal boluses of insulin was inversely associated with the coefficient of variation (CV; coefficient β = -0.073; 95% confidence interval: -0.130, -0.015; p = 0.016), as well as sleep duration. The higher the sleep duration, the lower the glycaemic variability (coefficient β = -0.012; 95% confidence interval: -0.023, -0.002; p = 0.027). The mean 7 days physical activity of the subjects was very low and was not associated with glycaemic control on the 7 days mean values. However, days with at least 1 hr spent in physical activity higher than 1.5 METs were associated with less glycaemic variability that same day. This real-life observation highlights the importance of sufficient sleep duration and regular physical activity to lessen the glycaemic variability of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.13799

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gauthier, P., Desir, C., Plombas, M., Joffray, E., Benhamou, P., & Borel, A.
Affiliations
  • Diabeloop® Grenoble France
  • IC@dom SASU (France) (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-12-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
e13799-e13799
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W4311019900
Cited by
10
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, glycemic variability, sleep duration, physical activity, multiple daily insulin injections, insulin pump, flash glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, time in target, accelerometer-measured activity
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review