Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Cognitive View of Reading Comprehension: Implications for Reading Difficulties

Kendeou, Panayiota, van den Broek, Paul, Helder, Anne, Karlsson, Josefine·2014·Learning Disabilities Research & Practice

Abstract

Our aim in the present paper is to discuss a “cognitive view” of reading comprehension, with particular attention to research findings that have the potential to improve our understanding of difficulties in reading comprehension. We provide an overview of how specific sources of difficulties in inference making, executive functions, and attention allocation influence reading comprehension processes and outcomes and may lead to reading comprehension problems. Finally, we discuss how the consideration of these potential sources of difficulty have practical implications for the design and selection of instructional materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ldrp.12025

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.3109/02699206.2013.791880 · doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.791880
  2. 10.1177/00222194070400020801 · doi:10.1177/00222194070400020801
  3. 10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.245 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.3.371 · Paper page
  5. Helder A., 2013, Unraveling the behavioral, neurobiological, and genetic components of reading comprehension, 43
  6. Kendeou P., 2007, Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies, 27
  7. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.778 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.778 · Paper page
  8. Oakhill J., 1996, Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention, 69
  9. Perfetti C. A., 1985, Reading Ability
  10. den Broek P., 2011, Relevance instructions and goal‐ focusing in text learning, 123
  11. den Broek P., 1999, Reading for meaning, 1
  12. den Broek P., 1995, Sources of coherence in text comprehension, 353

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., Helder, A., & Karlsson, J.
Venue
Learning Disabilities Research & Practice
Published
2014-01-24
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
10-16
ISSN
  • 0938-8982 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5826
OpenAlex
W2164817788
Cited by
363
References
82
FWCI
43.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Cognitive View of Reading Comprehension: Implications for Reading Difficulties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ldrp.12025
The paper
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., Helder, A., & Karlsson, J. (2014). A Cognitive View of Reading Comprehension: Implications for Reading Difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.