The DOI matches its Crossref record; 220 of the 220 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fungal evolutionary genomics provides insight into the mechanisms of adaptive divergence in eukaryotes
Open accessAbstract
Fungi are ideal model organisms for dissecting the genomic bases of adaptive divergence in eukaryotes. They have simple morphologies and small genomes, occupy contrasting, well‐identified ecological niches and tend to have short generation times, and many are amenable to experimental approaches. Fungi also display diverse lifestyles, from saprotrophs to pathogens or mutualists, and they play extremely important roles in both ecosystems and human activities, as wood decayers, mycorrhizal fungi, lichens, endophytes, plant and animal pathogens, and in fermentation or drug production. We review here recent insights into the patterns and mechanisms of adaptive divergence in fungi, including sources of divergence, genomic variation and, ultimately, speciation. We outline the various ecological sources of divergent selection and genomic changes, showing that gene loss and changes in gene expression and in genomic architecture are important adaptation processes, in addition to the more widely recognized processes of amino acid substitution and gene duplication. We also review recent findings regarding the interspecific acquisition of genomic variation and suggesting an important role for introgression, hybridization and horizontal gene transfers (HGTs). We show that transposable elements can mediate several of these genomic changes, thus constituting important factors for adaptation. Finally, we review the consequences of divergent selection in terms of speciation, arguing that genetic incompatibilities may not be as widespread as generally thought and that pleiotropy between adaptation and reproductive isolation is an important route of speciation in fungal pathogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Ohno, S. (1970) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3 · Cited by 7,833
Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome
Giaever, G., Chu, A. M., Ni, L., Connelly, C., Riles, L., Véronneau, S., Dow, S., Lucau-Danila, A., Anderson, K., André, B., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00935 · Cited by 4,316
Functional Characterization of the S. cerevisiae Genome by Gene Deletion and Parallel Analysis
Winzeler, E. A., Shoemaker, D. D., Astromoff, A., Liang, H., Anderson, K., Andre, B., Bangham, R., Benito, R., Boeke, J. D., Bussey, H., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5429.901 · Cited by 3,953
Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions
Dodds, P. N., & Rathjen, J. P. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2812 · Cited by 3,424
Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health
Fisher, M. C., Henk, D. A., Briggs, C. J., Brownstein, J. S., Madoff, L. C., McCraw, S. L., & Gurr, S. J. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10947 · Cited by 3,310
The Genetic Landscape of a Cell
Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Bellay, J., Kim, Y., Spear, E. D., Sevier, C. S., Ding, H., Koh, J. L. Y., Toufighi, K., Mostafavi, S., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1180823 · Cited by 2,162
Gutenkunst, R. N., Hernandez, R. D., Williamson, S. H., & Bustamante, C. D. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000695 · Cited by 1,906 · cited 1×
“Advances in theoretical population genomics have also increased power for the inference of demographic parameters (Gutenkunst et al. 2009; Excoffier et al. 2013), determinations of the relative importance of natural selection and ran-”
BackgroundReconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny
James, T. Y., Kauff, F., Schoch, C. L., Matheny, P. B., Hofstetter, V., Cox, C. J., Celio, G., Gueidan, C., Fraker, E., Miadlikowska, J., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05110 · Cited by 1,815
The Paleozoic Origin of Enzymatic Lignin Decomposition Reconstructed from 31 Fungal Genomes
Floudas, D., Binder, M., Riley, R., Barry, K., Blanchette, R. A., Henrissat, B., Martínez, A. T., Otillar, R., Spatafora, J. W., Yadav, J. S., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1221748 · Cited by 1,779
Metadata
- Authors
- Gladieux, P., Ropars, J., Badouin, H., Branca, A., Aguileta, G., de Vienne, D. M., Rodríguez de la Vega, R. C., Branco, S., & Giraud, T.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01-22
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 753-773
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2028657310
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 220
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungal evolutionary genomics provides insight into the mechanisms of adaptive divergence in eukaryotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.12631
- The paper
- Gladieux, P., Ropars, J., Badouin, H., Branca, A., Aguileta, G., de Vienne, D. M., Rodríguez de la Vega, R. C., Branco, S., & Giraud, T. (2014). Fungal evolutionary genomics provides insight into the mechanisms of adaptive divergence in eukaryotes. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12631
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.