The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diet strongly influences the gut microbiota of surgeonfishes
Abstract
Intestinal tracts are among the most densely populated microbial ecosystems. Gut microbiota and their influence on the host have been well characterized in terrestrial vertebrates but much less so in fish. This is especially true for coral reef fishes, which are among the most abundant groups of vertebrates on earth. Surgeonfishes (family: Acanthuridae) are part of a large and diverse family of reef fish that display a wide range of feeding behaviours, which in turn has a strong impact on the reef ecology. Here, we studied the composition of the gut microbiota of nine surgeonfish and three nonsurgeonfish species from the Red Sea. High‐throughput pyrosequencing results showed that members of the phylum Firmicutes, especially of the genus Epulopiscium, were dominant in the gut microbiota of seven surgeonfishes. Even so, there were large inter‐ and intraspecies differences in the diversity of surgeonfish microbiota. Replicates of the same host species shared only a small number of operational taxonomic units (OTU s), although these accounted for most of the sequences. There was a statistically significant correlation between the phylogeny of the host and their gut microbiota, but the two were not completely congruent. Notably, the gut microbiota of three nonsurgeonfish species clustered with some surgeonfish species. The microbiota of the macro‐ and microalgavores was distinct, while the microbiota of the others (carnivores, omnivores and detritivores) seemed to be transient and dynamic. Despite some anomalies, both host phylogeny and diet were important drivers for the intestinal microbial community structure of surgeonfishes from the Red Sea.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing
MetaHIT Consortium, Qin, J., Li, R., Raes, J., Arumugam, M., Burgdorf, K. S., Manichanh, C., Nielsen, T., Pons, N., Levenez, F., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08821 · Cited by 11,624
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease
Round, J. L., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2009) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2515 · Cited by 5,029
Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes
Ley, R. E., Hamady, M., Lozupone, C., Turnbaugh, P. J., Ramey, R. R., Bircher, J. S., Schlegel, M. L., Tucker, T. A., Schrenzel, M. D., Knight, R., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155725 · Cited by 3,747
Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly
Claesson, M. J., Jeffery, I. B., Conde, S., Power, S. E., O’Connor, E. M., Cusack, S., Harris, H. M. B., Coakley, M., Lakshminarayanan, B., O’Sullivan, O., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11319 · Cited by 3,314
Diet Drives Convergence in Gut Microbiome Functions Across Mammalian Phylogeny and Within Humans
Muegge, B. D., Kuczynski, J., Knights, D., Clemente, J. C., González, A., Fontana, L., Henrissat, B., Knight, R., & Gordon, J. I. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198719 · Cited by 1,988
Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs
Roberts, C. M., McClean, C. J., Veron, J. E. N., Hawkins, J. P., Allen, G. R., McAllister, D. E., Mittermeier, C. G., Schueler, F. W., Spalding, M., Wells, F., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067728 · Cited by 1,691
Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering
Huse, S. M., Welch, D. M., Morrison, H. G., & Sogin, M. L. (2010) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02193.x · Cited by 1,346
Diversity and distribution of coral-associated bacteria
Rohwer, F., Seguritan, V, Azam, F., & Knowlton, N. (2002) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps243001 · Cited by 1,337
Role of gastrointestinal microbiota in fish
Nayak, S. K. (2010) · Aquaculture Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02546.x · Cited by 1,073 · cited 1×
“…and phylogeny of the microbes (Huber et al. 2004; Clements et al. 2007; Kim et al. 2007; Ward et al. 2009; Smriga et al. 2010) using conventional techniques (cultivation or clone libraries) at suboptimal sequencing depths (see Nayak (2010); Sullam et al. (2012) for summaries of pertinent studies).”
Background
Cited by
The Gut Microbiota of Marine Fish
Egerton, S., Culloty, S., Whooley, J., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. P. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00873 · Cited by 963
Yukgehnaish, K., Kumar, P., Sivachandran, P., Marimuthu, K., Arshad, A., Paray, B. A., & Arockiaraj, J. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12416 · Cited by 470
Rohani, M. F., Islam, S. M., Hossain, M. K., Ferdous, Z., Siddik, M. A., Nuruzzaman, M., Padeniya, U., Brown, C., & Shahjahan, M. (2022) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.037 · Cited by 319
The functional roles of surgeonfishes on coral reefs: Past, present and future
Tebbett, S. B., Siqueira, A. C., & Bellwood, D. R. (2022) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-021-09692-6 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Miyake, S., Ngugi, D. K., & Stingl, U.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 656-672
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2129616030
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diet strongly influences the gut microbiota of surgeonfishes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.13050
- The paper
- Miyake, S., Ngugi, D. K., & Stingl, U. (2015). Diet strongly influences the gut microbiota of surgeonfishes. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.