Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetics and the conservation of natural populations: allozymes to genomes

Open access
Allendorf, Fred W.·2017·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

I consider how the study of genetic variation has influenced efforts to conserve natural populations over the last 50 years. Studies with allozymes in the 1970s provided the first estimates of the amount of genetic variation within and between natural populations at multiple loci. These early studies played an important role in developing plans to conserve species. The description of genetic variation in mitochondrial DNA in the early 1980s laid the foundation for the field of phylogeography, which provided a deeper look in time of the relationships and connectivity among populations. The development of microsatellites in the 1990s provided much more powerful means to describe genetic variation at nuclear loci, including the ability to detect past bottlenecks and estimate current effective population size with a single temporal sample. In the 2000s, single nucleotide polymorphisms presented a cornucopia of loci that has greatly improved power to estimate genetic and population demographic parameters important for conservation. Today, population genomics presents the ability to detect regions of the genome that are affected by natural selection (e.g. local adaptation or inbreeding depression). In addition, the ability to genotype historical samples has provided power to understand how climate change and other anthropogenic phenomena have affected populations. Modern molecular techniques provide unprecedented power to understand genetic variation in natural populations. Nevertheless, application of this information requires sound understanding of population genetics theory. I believe that current training in conservation genetics focuses too much on the latest techniques and too little on understanding the conceptual basis which is needed to interpret these data and ask good questions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mec.13948

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 108 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Allendorf FW, 2013, Genetics and the Conservation of Populations
  2. 10.1111/mec.13681 · doi:10.1111/mec.13681
  3. 10.1126/science.424751 · doi:10.1126/science.424751
  4. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00816.x · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00816.x
  5. 10.1007/BF00354326 · doi:10.1007/bf00354326
  6. Felsenstein J, 2015, Theoretical Evolutionary Genetics
  7. Hamrick JL, 1990, Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources, 43
  8. 10.1038/502303b · doi:10.1038/502303b
  9. 10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<1223:GDOSSO>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<1223:gdosso>2.0.co;2
  10. Selander RK, 1976, Molecular Evolution, 21
  11. 10.2307/2992412 · doi:10.2307/2992412
  12. 10.1577/1548-8446(1993)018<0011:GMAMSF>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1993)018<0011:gmamsf>2.0.co;2
  13. 10.1577/1548-8446(1990)015<0019:GATTMO>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1990)015<0019:gattmo>2.0.co;2

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Allendorf, F. W.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
420-430
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2559804122
Cited by
388
References
108
FWCI
17.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Funders
National Science Foundation (DEB‐1067613, DEB-1067613)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetics and the conservation of natural populations: allozymes to genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.13948
The paper
Allendorf, F. W. (2017). Genetics and the conservation of natural populations: allozymes to genomes. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13948

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.