The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetics and the conservation of natural populations: allozymes to genomes
Open accessAbstract
I consider how the study of genetic variation has influenced efforts to conserve natural populations over the last 50 years. Studies with allozymes in the 1970s provided the first estimates of the amount of genetic variation within and between natural populations at multiple loci. These early studies played an important role in developing plans to conserve species. The description of genetic variation in mitochondrial DNA in the early 1980s laid the foundation for the field of phylogeography, which provided a deeper look in time of the relationships and connectivity among populations. The development of microsatellites in the 1990s provided much more powerful means to describe genetic variation at nuclear loci, including the ability to detect past bottlenecks and estimate current effective population size with a single temporal sample. In the 2000s, single nucleotide polymorphisms presented a cornucopia of loci that has greatly improved power to estimate genetic and population demographic parameters important for conservation. Today, population genomics presents the ability to detect regions of the genome that are affected by natural selection (e.g. local adaptation or inbreeding depression). In addition, the ability to genotype historical samples has provided power to understand how climate change and other anthropogenic phenomena have affected populations. Modern molecular techniques provide unprecedented power to understand genetic variation in natural populations. Nevertheless, application of this information requires sound understanding of population genetics theory. I believe that current training in conservation genetics focuses too much on the latest techniques and too little on understanding the conceptual basis which is needed to interpret these data and ask good questions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,908
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1979) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1179-98 · Cited by 7,666
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623486 · Cited by 6,347
Phylogeography: the history and formation of species
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-5647 · Cited by 4,538
THE GENETIC BASIS OF EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE
Felsenstein, J. (1975) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00851.x · Cited by 3,912
Defining ‘Evolutionarily Significant Units’ for conservation
Moritz, C. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90057-4 · Cited by 3,348
Inbreeding effects in wild populations
Keller, L. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02489-8 · Cited by 3,309
EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIP OF DNA SEQUENCES IN FINITE POPULATIONS
Tajima, F. (1983) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/105.2.437 · Cited by 3,092
Allozyme diversity in plant species
Hamrick, J. L., & Godt, M. J. W. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,643
THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION
Kimura, M., & Crow, J. F. (1964) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/49.4.725 · Cited by 2,620
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Allendorf FW, 2013, Genetics and the Conservation of Populations
- 10.1111/mec.13681 · doi:10.1111/mec.13681
- 10.1126/science.424751 · doi:10.1126/science.424751
- 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00816.x · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00816.x
- 10.1007/BF00354326 · doi:10.1007/bf00354326
- Felsenstein J, 2015, Theoretical Evolutionary Genetics
- Hamrick JL, 1990, Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources, 43
- 10.1038/502303b · doi:10.1038/502303b
- 10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<1223:GDOSSO>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<1223:gdosso>2.0.co;2
- Selander RK, 1976, Molecular Evolution, 21
- 10.2307/2992412 · doi:10.2307/2992412
- 10.1577/1548-8446(1993)018<0011:GMAMSF>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1993)018<0011:gmamsf>2.0.co;2
- 10.1577/1548-8446(1990)015<0019:GATTMO>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1990)015<0019:gattmo>2.0.co;2
Cited by
Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management
Hohenlohe, P. A., Funk, W. C., & Rajora, O. P. (2021) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15720 · Cited by 702
The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation
Kardos, M., Armstrong, E. E., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Hauser, S., Hedrick, P. W., Miller, J. M., Tallmon, D. A., & Funk, W. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2104642118 · Cited by 607
Climate change vulnerability assessment of species
Foden, W. B., Young, B. E., Akçakaya, H. R., Garcia, R. A., Hoffmann, A. A., Stein, B. A., Thomas, C. D., Wheatley, C. J., Bickford, D., Carr, J. A., et al. (2019) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.551 · Cited by 527
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Self-citationThe Value of Reference Genomes in the Conservation of Threatened Species
Brandies, P., Peel, E., Hogg, C. J., & Belov, K. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10110846 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Allendorf, F. W.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 420-430
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2559804122
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 17.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DEB‐1067613, DEB-1067613)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetics and the conservation of natural populations: allozymes to genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/mec.13948
- The paper
- Allendorf, F. W. (2017). Genetics and the conservation of natural populations: allozymes to genomes. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.