Cited by 71Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: the learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information

Open access
Molloy, Elizabeth, Boud, David·2013·Medical Education

Abstract

Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: the learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: the learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/medu.12116

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molloy, E., & Boud, D.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Molloy, Elizabeth
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-08
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
227-229
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W1982500000
Cited by
71
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
feedback, clinical teaching, performance information, student-centered feedback
MeSH terms
Animals, Clinical Clerkship, Education, Veterinary, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review