Cited by 17Innovative Education and Learning PracticesInnovations in Medical EducationAppreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change

The change laboratory in medical education: Two examples of tackling contradictory challenges

Skipper, Mads, Nøhr, Susanne Backman, Engeström, Yrjö·2021·Medical Education

Abstract

Context: Medical education and workplace learning is bound to develop through tensions between providing high quality patient care and providing training of the future specialist healthcare workforce. This paper on the Change Laboratory and the theoretical framework supporting it, shows examples on how to explore inherent and contradictory tensions in medical education and healthcare and use them as a driving force for change. We argue that the traditional tools and theories for change and fixing tensions are inadequate and therefore suggest an alternative strategy found in Cultural‐Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) and the Change Laboratory method. Methods: The Change Laboratory intervention method builds on the theoretical framework of CHAT and specifically the theory of expansive learning. The Change Laboratory intervention method uses well‐defined steps for participants in collaboration with researchers/facilitators to co‐construct and develop new ways of going about their work practice. Results: Drawing on our own research on implementing the Change Laboratory intervention method we present two case examples of interventions in respectively a Finnish surgical unit and a Danish paediatric outpatient clinic. Conclusions: The Change Laboratory intervention offers ways to systematically leverage tensions in medical education and thus could be effective in developing and designing organisational and professional change. It is not a quick fix solution as participators must be motivated and engaged in uncovering inherent contradictions in their activity systems (workplace) and get familiar with the concepts and theory underlying the intervention and its procedures. Profound knowledge and transformative agency emerges when participants and facilitators/researchers are given the time and opportunity to analyse both historical practice, current data on practice, and organisational issues collaboratively in order to envision and redesign their practice and learning environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/medu.14298

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skipper, M., Nøhr, S. B., & Engeström, Y.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Skipper, Mads
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-07
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
93-100
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W3045668842
Cited by
17
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
Keywords
Change Laboratory, cultural-historical activity theory, expansive learning, tensions and contradictions, organizational change, workplace learning, surgical wards, pediatric outpatient clinic, transformative agency, learning environment redesign
MeSH terms
Child, Delivery of Health Care, Education, Medical, Health Personnel, Humans, Laboratories, Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review