Cited by 222Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyPain Management and Treatment

Muscle Control and Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Open access
Russo, Marc, Deckers, Kristiaan, Eldabe, Sam, Kiesel, Kyle, Gilligan, Chris, Vieceli, John, Crosby, Peter·2018·Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the most prevalent of the painful musculoskeletal conditions. CLBP is a heterogeneous condition with many causes and diagnoses, but there are few established therapies with strong evidence of effectiveness (or cost effectiveness). CLBP for which it is not possible to identify any specific cause is often referred to as non-specific chronic LBP (NSCLBP). One type of NSCLBP is continuing and recurrent primarily nociceptive CLBP due to vertebral joint overload subsequent to functional instability of the lumbar spine. This condition may occur due to disruption of the motor control system to the key stabilizing muscles in the lumbar spine, particularly the lumbar multifidus muscle (MF). METHODS: This review presents the evidence for MF involvement in CLBP, mechanisms of action of disruption of control of the MF, and options for restoring control of the MF as a treatment for NSCLBP. RESULTS: Imaging assessment of motor control dysfunction of the MF in individual patients is fraught with difficulty. MRI or ultrasound imaging techniques, while reliable, have limited diagnostic or predictive utility. For some patients, restoration of motor control to the MF with specific exercises can be effective, but population results are not persuasive since most patients are unable to voluntarily contract the MF and may be inhibited from doing so due to arthrogenic muscle inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting MF control with restorative neurostimulation promises a new treatment option.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ner.12738

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with NCLBP have significant atrophy, fat infiltration, and/or decrease in activation of the TrA and LM muscles.

    “Studies have reported that there is significant atrophy, fat infiltration, and/or decrease in activation of the TrA and LM muscles in individuals with NCLBP [8, 9].”

    From Effect of m-health-based core stability exercise combined with self-compassion training for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [8]

    In the Introduction’s “Clinical Instability and CLBP” section (page unavailable), the paper reports lumbar multifidus atrophy and fat infiltration in people with chronic low back pain. Its “Imaging Assessment of Motor Control Dysfunction” section (page unavailable) also describes diminished multifidus thickness change during activation. The copy does not establish comparable atrophy, fat infiltration, or decreased activation of the transversus abdominis (TrA), so the claim about both muscles is only partially supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [44]Rice DA, McNair PJ. Quadriceps arthrogenic muscle inhibition: neural mechanisms and treatment perspectives. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010; 40: 250– 266. 19954822

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russo, M., Deckers, K., Eldabe, S., Kiesel, K., Gilligan, C., Vieceli, J., & Crosby, P.
Affiliations
  • GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus (BE)
  • James Cook University Hospital (GB)
  • University of Evansville (US)
Corresponding author
Russo, Marc
Venue
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
1094-7159 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774951579
Cited by
222
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mainstay Medical International plc
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic non-specific low back pain, lumbar multifidus, lumbar instability, arthrogenic muscle inhibition, neurostimulation, exercise therapy, nociceptive pain
MeSH terms
Electromyography, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Pain Measurement, Low Back Pain, Muscle, Skeletal, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review