Cited by 6Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPalliative and Oncologic CareMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Professional approach to the care of women who have suffered a perinatal loss

Open access
Rubio‐Alvarez, Ana, Jiménez‐Ramos, Carmen, Bravo‐Vaquero, Carolina, Pulgarín‐Pulgarín, Beatriz, Rodríguez‐Almagro, Julián, Hernández‐Martínez, Antonio·2024·Nursing & Health Sciences

Abstract

To understand the experience, training, and needs of midwives in their approach to perinatal grief. A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out using an online questionnaire with 26 questions related to institutional management and individual clinical practices in the care of a perinatal loss was developed by a team of midwives from the Hospital "La Mancha-Centro" of Alcazar de San Juan (Ciudad Real). Strobe checklist was followed. A total of 267 midwives participated. A total of 92.1% (246) of the centers had specific protocols for action, but each professional applied their own criteria. The presence of a perinatal psychology team was nonexistent according to 88% (235) of those surveyed. Regarding their training and professional experience, 16.5% (44) of the midwives had never received training. Only 4.1% (11) of the midwives felt very prepared to care for women with a perinatal loss. Among the factors associated with greater application of recommended practices in the face of perinatal death by midwives were being a woman, having prior training on care during perinatal death, and a greater perception of preparation (p < 0.05). The perception of lack of preparation on the part of midwives in the accompaniment of these families was high.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nhs.13116

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few professionals report feeling prepared to offer adequate support, revealing the absence of specific protocols and the fragmentation of follow-up care.

    “As observed in the literature, few professionals report feeling prepared to offer adequate support, revealing the absence of specific protocols and the fragmentation of follow-up care (49).”

    From Experiences and long-term repercussions of perinatal grief in women after perinatal bereavement: a meta-ethnography (2025) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Discussion reports that 53.9% of surveyed midwives did not feel adequately trained, and only 19.9% said a perinatal loss was communicated to primary care, supporting concerns about preparation and continuity of care. But it says most centers had specific protocols: 92.1% reported having one, although professionals applied their own criteria. The claim’s assertion that protocols were absent is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubio‐Alvarez, A., Jiménez‐Ramos, C., Bravo‐Vaquero, C., Pulgarín‐Pulgarín, B., Rodríguez‐Almagro, J., & Hernández‐Martínez, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology Hospital Universitario de Torrejón Madrid Spain
  • Hospital General de Tomelloso (ES)
  • Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology Gerencia de Atencion Primaria Alcázar de San Juan Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real Spain
  • Madrid Health Service (ES)
  • University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Corresponding author
Rodríguez‐Almagro, Julián
Venue
Nursing & Health Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-04-02
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
e13116-e13116
ISSN
  • 1441-0745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1442-2018
OpenAlex
W4393866299
Cited by
6
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nursing and Health Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUIdeRA - Institutional University Repository (University of Castilla-La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
perinatal loss, perinatal grief, midwives, midwifery education, perinatal death, institutional protocols, perinatal psychology, professional preparedness, family support
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Midwifery, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Perinatal Care, Perinatal Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review