Cited by 69Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthInfant Development and Preterm Care

Seeing and Holding Baby: Systematic Review of Clinical Management and Parental Outcomes After Stillbirth

Kingdon, Carol, Givens, Jennifer L., O'Donnell, Emer, Turner, Mark·2015·Birth

Abstract

Background: In 2009 there were an estimated 2.6 million stillbirths worldwide. In the United States, a 2007 systematic review found little consensus about professional behaviors perceived by parents to be most helpful or most distressing. In the United Kingdom, a bereaved parents' organization has highlighted discordance between parental views and clinical guidelines that recommend clinicians do not encourage parents to see and hold their baby. The objective of this review was to identify and synthesize available research reporting parental outcomes relating to seeing and holding. Methods: We undertook a systematic review. We included studies of any design, reporting parental experiences and outcomes. Electronic searches (PubMed and Psych INFO) were conducted in January 2014. Three authors independently screened and assessed the quality of the studies before abstracting data and undertaking thematic analysis. Results: We reviewed 741 records and included 23 studies (10 quantitative, 12 qualitative, and 1 mixed‐method). Twenty‐one studies suggested positive outcomes for parents who saw or held their baby. Increased psychological morbidity was associated with current pregnancy, choice not to see their baby, lack of time with their baby and/or insufficient mementos. Three themes were formulated “positive effects of contact within a traumatic life event,” “importance of role of health professionals,” and “impact on mothers and fathers: similarities and differences.” Conclusions: Stillbirth is a risk factor for increased psychological morbidity. Parents seeing and holding their stillborn baby can be beneficial to their future well‐being. Since 2007, there has been a proliferation of studies that challenge clinical guidelines recommending that clinicians do not encourage parental contact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/birt.12176

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inconclusive findings on holding versus not holding the stillborn are in accordance with previous systematic reviews.

    “Inconclusive findings are in accordance with previous systematic reviews on the effect of holding versus not holding the stillborn [28, 49].”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kingdon, C., Givens, J. L., O'Donnell, E., & Turner, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Department of Women's and Children's Health Institute of Translational Medicine University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
Venue
Birth
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-25
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
206-218
ISSN
  • 0730-7659 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-536X
OpenAlex
W2099247017
Cited by
69
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
stillbirth, bereavement, health professionals' role, clinical guidelines, Memento, traumatic life events
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Pregnancy, Social Support, Touch, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review