Cited by 85Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthInfant Development and Preterm Care

Long-term outcomes for mothers who have or have not held their stillborn baby

Rådestad, Ingela, Surkan, Pamela J., Steineck, Gunnar, Cnattingius, Sven, Onelöv, Erik, Dickman, Paul W.·2009·Midwifery

Abstract

Objectives to investigate long-term outcomes of mothers who have or have not held their stillborn baby, and predictors of having held the baby.Design postal questionnaires.Setting a nation-wide cohort study of mothers who gave birth to a singleton stillborn baby in Sweden in 1991.Participants 314 out of 380 women answered the questionnaire and 309 reported whether or not they had held their baby.Measurements scales measuring anxiety, depression and well-being.Findings 126 (68%) mothers of 185 babies stillborn after 37 gestational weeks had held their baby and 82 (68%) mothers of 120 babies stillborn at gestational weeks 28-37 had also done so. Compared with mothers who agreed completely with the statement that staff gave enough support to hold the baby, mothers who did not agree were less likely to have held their baby [relative risk (RR) 4.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-6.1], and mothers with a low level of education were less likely to have held their baby than mothers with a higher level of education (RR 2.2; 95% CI 1.3-3.8). Mothers who had not held their babies born after 37 gestational weeks had an increased risk of headache (RR 4.3; 95% CI 1.1-16.5), and they were less satisfied with their sleep (RR 2.7; 95% CI 1.5-5.0). The increased risk of long-term outcomes associated with not holding, compared with holding, a stillborn baby were less pronounced for women who gave birth at gestational week 28-37 compared with women who gave birth after 37 gestational weeks.Key conclusions in this cohort, we found an overall beneficial effect of having held a stillborn baby born after 37 gestational weeks, whereas findings for having held a stillborn baby born at gestational weeks 28-37 are uncertain. The attitude of staff influenced whether or not the mother held her stillborn baby.Implications for practice if the mother is guided by staff in a sensitive way to hold her stillborn term baby, the experience will possibly be beneficial for her in the long term.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2007.03.005

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Six studies investigated predictors of depression symptoms among women who had experienced stillbirth.

    “Six studies investigated predictors of depression symptoms among women who had experienced SB [3, 37, 40–43].”
  • There was no significant relationship between whether mothers held the stillborn and anxiety symptoms.

    “The study did not detect a significant relationship between whether the mothers held the stillborn and anxiety symptoms.”
  • Three studies investigated predictors of anxiety following stillbirth.

    “Three studies [3, 40, 41] investigated predictors of anxiety following SB.”
  • Råadestad et al. found a potential beneficial effect of holding the baby after stillbirth on parental mental health, but the small sample size yielded high uncertainty, precluding clear conclusions.

    “Chung and Reed [35] did not find a significant association, whereas Råadestad et al. [41] found a potential beneficial effect, but the small sample size in this study yielded high uncertainty in the estimate, precluding clear conclusions to be reached.”
  • Four included studies had a sample of women who experienced stillbirth in 1991, identified through the medical birth register of Sweden.

    “Four of the studies [40–43] had a sample of women who experienced SB in 1991, identified through the medical birth register of Sweden”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rådestad, I., Surkan, P. J., Steineck, G., Cnattingius, S., Onelöv, E., & Dickman, P. W.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rådestad, Ingela
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
422-429
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142078686
Cited by
85
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
stillbirth, maternal outcomes, maternal anxiety, maternal depression, maternal well-being, sleep satisfaction, headache, staff support, maternal education, perinatal loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Mental Health, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy, Risk, Socioeconomic Factors, Sweden, Time, Cohort Studies, Age Distribution, Stillbirth, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review