Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 397

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 217 of the 217 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration: from the geological past to the next century

Open access
Franks, Peter J., Adams, Mark A., Amthor, Jeffrey S., Barbour, Margaret M., Berry, Joseph A., Ellsworth, David S., Farquhar, Graham D., Ghannoum, Oula, Lloyd, Jon, McDowell, Nate, Norby, Richard J., Tissue, David T., von Caemmerer, Susanne·2013·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: The rate of CO2 assimilation by plants is directly influenced by the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, ca. As an environmental variable, ca also has a unique global and historic significance. Although relatively stable and uniform in the short term, global ca has varied substantially on the timescale of thousands to millions of years, and currently is increasing at seemingly an unprecedented rate. This may exert profound impacts on both climate and plant function. Here we utilise extensive datasets and models to develop an integrated, multi‐scale assessment of the impact of changing ca on plant carbon dioxide uptake and water use. We find that, overall, the sensitivity of plants to rising or falling ca is qualitatively similar across all scales considered. It is characterised by an adaptive feedback response that tends to maintain 1 − ci/ca, the relative gradient for CO2 diffusion into the leaf, relatively constant. This is achieved through predictable adjustments to stomatal anatomy and chloroplast biochemistry. Importantly, the long‐term response to changing ca can be described by simple equations rooted in the formulation of more commonly studied short‐term responses. Contents Summary 1077 I. Introduction 1078 II. Atmospheric CO 2 concentrations through time 1079 III. Plant sensitivity to CO 2 at geological timescales 1080 IV. Plant sensitivity to CO 2 over the last 200 yr 1081 V. Increased water‐use efficiency? 1084 VI. Simple formulation of stomatal conductance in land surface models for simulating long‐term CO 2 response 1087 VII. Conclusions 1088 Acknowledgements 1089 References 1089

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.12104

Cites

217 of 217 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 217 references

Cited by

See all 397

Metadata

Authors
Franks, P. J., Adams, M. A., Amthor, J. S., Barbour, M. M., Berry, J. A., Ellsworth, D. S., Farquhar, G. D., Ghannoum, O., Lloyd, J., McDowell, N., Norby, R. J., Tissue, D. T., & von Caemmerer, S.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-25
Volume
197
Issue
4
Pages
1077-1094
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2125122025
Cited by
397
References
217
FWCI
42.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration: from the geological past to the next century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12104
The paper
Franks, P. J., Adams, M. A., Amthor, J. S., Barbour, M. M., Berry, J. A., Ellsworth, D. S., Farquhar, G. D., Ghannoum, O., Lloyd, J., McDowell, N., Norby, R. J., Tissue, D. T., & von Caemmerer, S. (2013). Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration: from the geological past to the next century. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.