The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age, allocation and availability of nonstructural carbon in mature red maple trees
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The allocation of nonstructural carbon (NSC) to growth, metabolism and storage remains poorly understood, but is critical for the prediction of stress tolerance and mortality. We used the radiocarbon (14C) ‘bomb spike’ as a tracer of substrate and age of carbon in stemwood NSC, CO2 emitted by stems, tree ring cellulose and stump sprouts regenerated following harvesting in mature red maple trees. We addressed the following questions: which factors influence the age of stemwood NSC?; to what extent is stored vs new NSC used for metabolism and growth?; and, is older, stored NSC available for use? The mean age of extracted stemwood NSC was 10 yr. More vigorous trees had both larger and younger stemwood NSC pools. NSC used to support metabolism (stem CO2) was 1–2 yr old in spring before leaves emerged, but reflected current‐year photosynthetic products in late summer. The tree ring cellulose 14C age was 0.9 yr older than direct ring counts. Stump sprouts were formed from NSC up to 17 yr old. Thus, younger NSC is preferentially used for growth and day‐to‐day metabolic demands. More recently stored NSC contributes to annual ring growth and metabolism in the dormant season, yet decade‐old and older NSC is accessible for regrowth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data
Stuiver, M., & Polach, H. A. (1977) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200003672 · Cited by 5,640
Discussion: Reporting and Calibration of Post-Bomb 14 C Data
(2004) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200033154 · Cited by 906
Southon, J., Santos, G., Druffel-Rodriguez, K., Druffel, E., Trumbore, S., Xu, X., Griffin, S., Ali, S., & Mazon, M. (2004) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200039333 · Cited by 142
Self-citation
Cited by
Hartmann, H., & Trumbore, S. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13955 · Cited by 886
ATMOSPHERIC RADIOCARBON FOR THE PERIOD 1950–2019
Hua, Q., Turnbull, J. C., Santos, G. M., Rakowski, A. Z., Ancapichún, S., De Pol-Holz, R., Hammer, S., Lehman, S. J., Levin, I., Miller, J. B., et al. (2022) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2021.95 · Cited by 458
McDonald, L., Chivall, D., Miles, D., & Bronk Ramsey, C. (2019) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2018.64 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Carbone, M. S., Czimczik, C. I., Keenan, T. F., Murakami, P. F., Pederson, N., Schaberg, P. G., Xu, X., & Richardson, A. D.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-27
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1145-1155
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1997369189
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age, allocation and availability of nonstructural carbon in mature red maple trees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.12448
- The paper
- Carbone, M. S., Czimczik, C. I., Keenan, T. F., Murakami, P. F., Pederson, N., Schaberg, P. G., Xu, X., & Richardson, A. D. (2013). Age, allocation and availability of nonstructural carbon in mature red maple trees. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12448
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.