Cited by 906Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesRadioactive Decay and Measurement TechniquesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

Discussion: Reporting and Calibration of Post-Bomb 14 C Data

Open access
Paula J. Reimer, Thomas A. Brown, Ron Reimer·2004·Radiocarbon

Abstract

The definitive paper by Stuiver and Polach (1977) established the conventions for reporting of radiocarbon data for chronological and geophysical studies based on the radioactive decay of 14 C in the sample since the year of sample death or formation. Several ways of reporting 14 C activity levels relative to a standard were also established, but no specific instructions were given for reporting nuclear weapons-testing (post-bomb) 14 C levels in samples. Because the use of post-bomb 14 C is becoming more prevalent in forensics, biology, and geosciences, a convention needs to be adopted. We advocate the use of fraction modern with a new symbol F 14 C to prevent confusion with the previously used Fm, which may or may not have been fractionation-corrected. We also discuss the calibration of post-bomb 14 C samples and the available data sets and compilations, but do not give a recommendation for a particular data set.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200033154

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 14C bomb peak is commonly found in most carbon reservoirs around the globe.

    “This ' 14 C bomb peak' (Fig. 2) is commonly found in most carbon reservoirs around the globe (Reimer et al., 2004;Levin et al., 2008;Hua et al., 2013), it provides a high-resolution chronometer for current scientific use, and owing to a relatively long half-life (5730 a) it will in general be detectable as a 'spike' for ~50 000 years into the future.”

    From When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal (2015) · cites this paper as Reimer et al., 2004

    The Calibration of Post-Bomb 14C Data section (page unavailable) describes post-bomb records in the atmosphere, tree rings, other organic materials, and marine samples across hemispheric zones. It does not establish that the bomb peak is commonly found in most carbon reservoirs worldwide; it also notes regional variation, particularly in marine records. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Mook WG, van der Plicht J. 1999. Reporting 14 C activi- https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033154 Published online by Cambridge University Press ties and concentrations. Radiocarbon 41(3):227-39.
  2. Stuiver M, Quay PD. 1981. Atmospheric 14 C changes re- sulting from fossil-fuel CO 2 release and cosmic-ray flux variability. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 53:349-62.
  3. Tans P. 1981. A compilation of bomb 14 C data for use in global carbon model calculations. In: Bolin B, editor. Carbon Cycle Modeling (SCOPE 16). New York: John Wiley and Sons. p 131-57.
  4. Trumbore S, Gaudinski JB, Hanson PJ, Southon JR. 2002. Quantifying ecosystem-atmosphere carbon ex- change with a 14 C label. Eos Transactions AGU 83: 267-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reimer, P. J., Brown, T. A., & Reimer, R.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2004
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
1299-1304
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W1820434448
Cited by
906
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) (acceptedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0407554)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (W-7405, -7405-ENG-48, W‐7405‐ENG‐48)
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (W-7405-ENG 48, -7405-Eng-48)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
radiocarbon dating, radiocarbon calibration, nuclear weapons testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review