Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Root structural and functional dynamics in terrestrial biosphere models – evaluation and recommendations

Open access
Warren, Jeffrey M., Hanson, Paul J., Iversen, Colleen M., Kumar, Jitendra, Walker, Anthony P., Wullschleger, Stan D.·2015·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: There is wide breadth of root function within ecosystems that should be considered when modeling the terrestrial biosphere. Root structure and function are closely associated with control of plant water and nutrient uptake from the soil, plant carbon (C) assimilation, partitioning and release to the soils, and control of biogeochemical cycles through interactions within the rhizosphere. Root function is extremely dynamic and dependent on internal plant signals, root traits and morphology, and the physical, chemical and biotic soil environment. While plant roots have significant structural and functional plasticity to changing environmental conditions, their dynamics are noticeably absent from the land component of process‐based Earth system models used to simulate global biogeochemical cycling. Their dynamic representation in large‐scale models should improve model veracity. Here, we describe current root inclusion in models across scales, ranging from mechanistic processes of single roots to parameterized root processes operating at the landscape scale. With this foundation we discuss how existing and future root functional knowledge, new data compilation efforts, and novel modeling platforms can be leveraged to enhance root functionality in large‐scale terrestrial biosphere models by improving parameterization within models, and introducing new components such as dynamic root distribution and root functional traits linked to resource extraction. ContentsSummary59I.Introduction59II.Current representation of root function in models62III.Recommendations for leveraging root knowledge into models69IV.Conclusions73Acknowledgements73References73

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.13034

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Warren, J. M., Hanson, P. J., Iversen, C. M., Kumar, J., Walker, A. P., & Wullschleger, S. D.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-26
Volume
205
Issue
1
Pages
59-78
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2116927862
Cited by
292
References
2
FWCI
16.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root structural and functional dynamics in terrestrial biosphere models – evaluation and recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13034
The paper
Warren, J. M., Hanson, P. J., Iversen, C. M., Kumar, J., Walker, A. P., & Wullschleger, S. D. (2015). Root structural and functional dynamics in terrestrial biosphere models – evaluation and recommendations. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13034

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.