The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploiting SNP s for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the outcrossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4‐coumarate:CoA ligase specificity and redundancy
Open accessAbstract
CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats), first discovered as an immune system of prokaryotes, has become a powerful tool for genome editing in eukaryotes (Gaj et al., 2013). Co-expression of the CRISPR-associated endonuclease (Cas9) with a chimeric guide-RNA (gRNA) targeting a GN19NGG motif results in a double-strand DNA break near NGG, the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) (Jinek et al., 2012). Processing by the endogenous DNA repair machinery generates small indels that, when located within a coding sequence, can disrupt the reading frame and render the gene nonfunctional. The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been successfully applied in several herbaceous systems (Belhaj et al., 2013; Harrison et al., 2014). Here we report its application in the woody perennial Populus using the 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL) gene family as a case study. We achieved 100% mutational efficiency for two 4CL genes targeted, with every transformant examined carrying biallelic modifications. The CRISPR/Cas9 system is highly sensitive to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), as cleavage for a third 4CL gene was abolished due to SNPs in the target sequence. For outcrossing species with a highly heterozygous genome, gRNA design must take into account the frequent occurrence of SNPs to achieve efficient genome editing. Two 4CL genes, 4CL1 and 4CL2, associated with lignin and flavonoid biosynthesis, respectively (Hu et al., 1998; Harding et al., 2002), were targeted for CRISPR/Cas9 editing. The Populus tremula × alba clone 717-1B4 (717) routinely used for transformation is divergent from the genome-sequenced Populus trichocarpa (Hamzeh & Dayanandan, 2004). Therefore, the 4CL1 and 4CL2 gRNAs designed from the reference genome were interrogated with in-house 717 RNA-Seq data to ensure the absence of SNPs which could limit Cas9 efficiency (Supporting Information Fig. S1). A third gRNA designed for 4CL5, a genome duplicate of 4CL1, was also included. The corresponding 717 sequence harbors one SNP in each allele near/within the PAM, both of which are expected to abolish targeting by the 4CL5-gRNA (Fig. S1). All three gRNA target sites are located within the first exon (Fig. S1a). For 717 transformation, the gRNA was expressed from the Medicago U6.6 promoter, along with a human codon-optimized Cas9 (Mali et al., 2013) under control of the CaMV 35S promoter in binary vector p201N-Cas9 (Jacobs et al., 2015) (Methods S1). Transformation with the Cas9-only vector serves as a control. Altogether, we generated over 30 independent transgenic lines per construct. Randomly selected 4CL1 and 4CL2 lines were subjected to amplicon-sequencing following the protocol of Jacobs et al. (2015). The data were then processed by AGEseq, a custom program we developed for analysis of genome editing by sequencing (L-J. Xue & C-J. Tsai, unpublished) (Methods S1), and biallelic mutations were confirmed in all cases (Fig. 1a). The indel patterns differed between alleles in most cases, with the vast majority of the mutations predicted to disrupt the open reading frame. Although 4CL1 and 4CL5 share a high level (89%) of nucleotide identity, no off-target cleavage of 4CL5 was detected in the 4CL1 mutants (Fig. S2a), supporting specificity of the 4CL1-gRNA. For plants transformed with the 4CL5-gRNA, no editing events were detected as predicted by the presence of SNPs within the corresponding 717 sequence (Fig. S2b). Five randomly selected Cas9 lines were also analyzed and no editing was detected in the three 4CL loci as shown for two representative lines (Figs 1a, S2). These results indicate that the CRISPR editing system is highly efficient and sequence-specific in poplar. Down-regulation of 4CL1 has been shown to reduce lignin accrual, alter monolignol composition and cause stem wood discoloration in several species, including Populus (Kajita et al., 1996; Hu et al., 1999; Voelker et al., 2010). Indeed, a reddish-brown wood color was observed in each of the 36 mutant 4CL1 lines we obtained (Fig. 1b), but with a uniformity that was unlike the patchy discoloration associated with uneven 4CL1 suppression in previous studies (Kajita et al., 1996; Voelker et al., 2010). Lignin content and syringyl-to-guaiacyl (S : G) monolignol ratio were reduced in the 4CL1 mutants (Fig. 1c,d). The lignin and wood discoloration phenotypes were remarkably steadfast among independent mutant lines with varying indel patterns, consistent with a null 4CL1. This high level of mutation efficiency and phenotypic reproducibility is unmatched in previous (antisense, sense co-suppression, or RNAi) studies where typically only a small number of the transformants showed significant changes (Kajita et al., 1996; Hu et al., 1999; Voelker et al., 2010). Despite the efficiency, lignin content was only reduced by c. 23%, suggesting functional redundancy of the 4CL family. The 4CL2 has been associated with flavonoid biosynthesis based on its expression in nonlignifying tissues (Hu et al.,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Wright, J., Agarwala, V., Scott, D. A., & Zhang, F. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · Cited by 11,133
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases
Hsu, P. D., Scott, D. A., Weinstein, J. A., Ran, F. A., Konermann, S., Agarwala, V., Li, Y., Fine, E. J., Wu, X., Shalem, O., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2647 · Cited by 4,741
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A., & Barbas, C. F. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 · Cited by 3,820
CRISPR-P: A Web Tool for Synthetic Single-Guide RNA Design of CRISPR-System in Plants
Lei, Y., Lu, L., Liu, H.-Y., Li, S., Xing, F., & Chen, L.-L. (2014) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/ssu044 · Cited by 801
Repression of lignin biosynthesis promotes cellulose accumulation and growth in transgenic trees
Hu, W.-J., Harding, S. A., Lung, J., Popko, J. L., Ralph, J., Stokke, D. D., Tsai, C.-J., & Chiang, V. L. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/11758 · Cited by 795
Self-citationBelhaj, K., Chaparro-Garcia, A., Kamoun, S., & Nekrasov, V. (2013) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/1746-4811-9-39 · Cited by 585
Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9
Jacobs, T. B., LaFayette, P. R., Schmitz, R. J., & Parrott, W. A. (2015) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12896-015-0131-2 · Cited by 577
Self-citationTsai, C., Harding, S. A., Tschaplinski, T. J., Lindroth, R. L., & Yuan, Y. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01798.x · Cited by 309
Self-citation
Cited by
Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify abiotic stress responses in plants
Osakabe, Y., Watanabe, T., Sugano, S. S., Ueta, R., Ishihara, R., Shinozaki, K., & Osakabe, K. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26685 · Cited by 367
CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in grape in the first generation
Wang, X., Tu, M., Wang, D., Liu, J., Li, Y., Li, Z., Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12832 · Cited by 367
Manghwar, H., Li, B., Ding, X., Hussain, A., Lindsey, K., Zhang, X., & Jin, S. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201902312 · Cited by 347
Kaur, N., Alok, A., Shivani, Kaur, N., Pandey, P., Awasthi, P., & Tiwari, S. (2018) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-017-0577-5 · Cited by 286
The CRISPR/Cas Genome-Editing Tool: Application in Improvement of Crops
Khatodia, S., Bhatotia, K., Passricha, N., Khurana, S. M. P., & Tuteja, N. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00506 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, X., Jacobs, T. B., Xue, L., Harding, S. A., & Tsai, C.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-13
- Volume
- 208
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 298-301
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2123872688
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploiting SNP s for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the outcrossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4‐coumarate:CoA ligase specificity and redundancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nph.13470
- The paper
- Zhou, X., Jacobs, T. B., Xue, L., Harding, S. A., & Tsai, C. (2015). Exploiting SNP s for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the outcrossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4‐coumarate:CoA ligase specificity and redundancy. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.