Cited by 48Employer Branding and e-HRMPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionAI and HR Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘The kids are alert’: Generation Y responses to employer use and monitoring of social networking sites

Open access
Hurrell, Scott A., Scholarios, Dora, Richards, James·2017·New Technology, Work and Employment

Abstract

Employer monitoring of employees’ and job applicants’ social networking site (SNS) data is widespread and growing, but remains ethically, legally and efficaciously controversial. Examining this emergent source of tension in the employment relationship, this paper explores how Generation Y employees experience and perceive employer use and monitoring of SNS s, and whether employer‐related concerns influenced their online behaviour. A survey of 385 employed students revealed widespread SNS engagement amongst respondents, with many experiencing some form of employer SNS use. Employer SNS use was, however, generally perceived negatively. Negativity took the form of procedural justice violations based on issues such as invasion of privacy. Nevertheless, many students displayed alertness through actively managing online profiles which, in turn, marginally yet significantly increased their justice perceptions. The study has ethical and practical implications for employer monitoring and use of SNS s, as well as contributing to our understanding of young people's online behaviour.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ntwe.12085

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research confirms that young people have high awareness of employers' use of social media for screening.

    “previous research confirms that young people have high awareness of employers' use of social media for screening (Hurrell et al. 2017)”

    From Cybervetting job applicants on social media: the new normal? (2020) · cites this paper as Hurrell et al. 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Ackroyd S., 1999, Organizational Misbehaviour
  2. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.797 · DOI
  3. 10.1108/17538371211192874 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/1468-005X.00061 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/a0026078 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00097.x · DOI
  7. Broughton A., 2011, Workplaces and Social Networking: The Implications for Employment Relations
  8. 10.1177/0894439310386567 · DOI
  9. 10.1108/02683940810904385 · DOI
  10. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), 2013, Social Technology, Social Business?
  11. 10.1007/s10551-010-0436-y · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/1748-8583.12033 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10869-011-9215-8 · DOI
  14. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), 2015, Trade Union Membership 2015
  15. Doherty R., 2010, Getting Social With Recruitment, Strategic HR Review, 9, 11, 10.1108/14754391011078063 · DOI
  16. Edwards P., 1986, Conflict at Work: A Materialist Analysis of Workplace Relations
  17. 10.1177/0018726713508142 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/258595 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/0018726707076698 · DOI
  20. Hair J., 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis
  21. 10.4135/9781446287941 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s10869-010-9160-y · DOI
  23. 10.1111/ntwe.12026 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/ntwe.12039 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kluemper D.H., 2015, Employee Recruitment, Selection and Assessment: Contemporary Issues for Theory and Practice
  26. 10.1111/ijsa.12026 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/13676261.2013.815701 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.03.008 · DOI
  29. Martin G., 2009, Web 2.0 and Human Resource Management: ‘Groundswell’ or Hype?
  30. 10.1111/ijmr.12061 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/08959280902970385 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/ijsa.12067 · DOI
  34. Pearson(2013) New German Act on Employee Privacy Likely.Chronicle of Data Collection: Privacy & Information Security News & Trends http://www.hldataprotection.com/2013/01/articles/employment-privacy/new-german-act-on-employee-data-privacy-imminent/(accessed 11 June 2016).
  35. 10.1111/ntwe.12028 · DOI
  36. 10.1089/cpb.2007.9927 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2008.00205.x · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0149206313503018 · DOI
  39. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000094 · DOI
  40. 10.1108/00400910910968337 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2011.01127.x · DOI
  42. 10.1177/1466138107083559 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.bushor.2010.04.004 · DOI
  44. 10.4337/9780857939272.00036 · DOI
  45. Trottier D., 2011, The Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media, 89
  46. 10.1177/1350508415598248 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/s10551-012-1505-1 · DOI
  48. Verhoeven H., 2008, Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Recruitment: A UK Study Into Employers’ Perceptions, International Review of Business Research Papers, 4, 364
  49. 10.1080/02673843.2013.812041 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hurrell, S. A., Scholarios, D., & Richards, J.
Affiliations
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Hurrell, Scott A.
  • Scholarios, Dora
  • Richards, James
Venue
New Technology, Work and Employment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
64-83
ISSN
  • 0268-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-005X
OpenAlex
W2581890572
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • New Technology Work and Employment (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
Keywords
employer monitoring, social networking sites, millennials, procedural justice, privacy violations, job applicants, young workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review