The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘The kids are alert’: Generation Y responses to employer use and monitoring of social networking sites
Open accessAbstract
Employer monitoring of employees’ and job applicants’ social networking site (SNS) data is widespread and growing, but remains ethically, legally and efficaciously controversial. Examining this emergent source of tension in the employment relationship, this paper explores how Generation Y employees experience and perceive employer use and monitoring of SNS s, and whether employer‐related concerns influenced their online behaviour. A survey of 385 employed students revealed widespread SNS engagement amongst respondents, with many experiencing some form of employer SNS use. Employer SNS use was, however, generally perceived negatively. Negativity took the form of procedural justice violations based on issues such as invasion of privacy. Nevertheless, many students displayed alertness through actively managing online profiles which, in turn, marginally yet significantly increased their justice perceptions. The study has ethical and practical implications for employer monitoring and use of SNS s, as well as contributing to our understanding of young people's online behaviour.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research confirms that young people have high awareness of employers' use of social media for screening.
“previous research confirms that young people have high awareness of employers' use of social media for screening (Hurrell et al. 2017)”
From Cybervetting job applicants on social media: the new normal? (2020) · cites this paper as Hurrell et al. 2017
Citations
Cites
Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?
Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028 · Cited by 1,501
Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta‐Analysis
Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x · Cited by 816
Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress and family satisfaction
Chesley, N. (2005) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00213.x · Cited by 506
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- Ackroyd S., 1999, Organizational Misbehaviour
- 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.797 · DOI
- 10.1108/17538371211192874 · DOI
- 10.1111/1468-005X.00061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0026078 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00097.x · DOI
- Broughton A., 2011, Workplaces and Social Networking: The Implications for Employment Relations
- 10.1177/0894439310386567 · DOI
- 10.1108/02683940810904385 · DOI
- Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), 2013, Social Technology, Social Business?
- 10.1007/s10551-010-0436-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1748-8583.12033 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10869-011-9215-8 · DOI
- Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), 2015, Trade Union Membership 2015
- Doherty R., 2010, Getting Social With Recruitment, Strategic HR Review, 9, 11, 10.1108/14754391011078063 · DOI
- Edwards P., 1986, Conflict at Work: A Materialist Analysis of Workplace Relations
- 10.1177/0018726713508142 · DOI
- 10.2307/258595 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0018726707076698 · DOI
- Hair J., 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis
- 10.4135/9781446287941 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10869-010-9160-y · DOI
- 10.1111/ntwe.12026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ntwe.12039 · DOI · Paper page
- Kluemper D.H., 2015, Employee Recruitment, Selection and Assessment: Contemporary Issues for Theory and Practice
- 10.1111/ijsa.12026 · DOI
- 10.1080/13676261.2013.815701 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.03.008 · DOI
- Martin G., 2009, Web 2.0 and Human Resource Management: ‘Groundswell’ or Hype?
- 10.1111/ijmr.12061 · DOI
- 10.1080/08959280902970385 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ijsa.12067 · DOI
- Pearson(2013) New German Act on Employee Privacy Likely.Chronicle of Data Collection: Privacy & Information Security News & Trends http://www.hldataprotection.com/2013/01/articles/employment-privacy/new-german-act-on-employee-data-privacy-imminent/(accessed 11 June 2016).
- 10.1111/ntwe.12028 · DOI
- 10.1089/cpb.2007.9927 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2008.00205.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206313503018 · DOI
- 10.1027/1866-5888/a000094 · DOI
- 10.1108/00400910910968337 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-1714.2011.01127.x · DOI
- 10.1177/1466138107083559 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bushor.2010.04.004 · DOI
- 10.4337/9780857939272.00036 · DOI
- Trottier D., 2011, The Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media, 89
- 10.1177/1350508415598248 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-012-1505-1 · DOI
- Verhoeven H., 2008, Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Recruitment: A UK Study Into Employers’ Perceptions, International Review of Business Research Papers, 4, 364
- 10.1080/02673843.2013.812041 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cybervetting job applicants on social media: the new normal?
Jacobson, J., & Gruzd, A. (2020) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09526-2 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Hurrell, S. A., Scholarios, D., & Richards, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hurrell, Scott A.
- Scholarios, Dora
- Richards, James
- Venue
- New Technology, Work and Employment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-83
- ISSN
- 0268-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-005X
- OpenAlex
- W2581890572
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- New Technology Work and Employment (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Keywords
- employer monitoring, social networking sites, millennials, procedural justice, privacy violations, job applicants, young workers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review