Cited by 79Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataEthics in Clinical ResearchThoreau and American Literature

Genome privacy: challenges, technical approaches to mitigate risk, and ethical considerations in the United States

Open access
Wang, Shuang, Jiang, Xiaoqian, Singh, Siddharth, Marmor, Rebecca, Bonomi, Luca, Fox, Dov, Dow, Michelle, Ohno‐Machado, Lucila·2017·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Accessing and integrating human genomic data with phenotypes are important for biomedical research. Making genomic data accessible for research purposes, however, must be handled carefully to avoid leakage of sensitive individual information to unauthorized parties and improper use of data. In this article, we focus on data sharing within the scope of data accessibility for research. Current common practices to gain biomedical data access are strictly rule based, without a clear and quantitative measurement of the risk of privacy breaches. In addition, several types of studies require privacy‐preserving linkage of genotype and phenotype information across different locations (e.g., genotypes stored in a sequencing facility and phenotypes stored in an electronic health record) to accelerate discoveries. The computer science community has developed a spectrum of techniques for data privacy and confidentiality protection, many of which have yet to be tested on real‐world problems. In this article, we discuss clinical, technical, and ethical aspects of genome data privacy and confidentiality in the United States, as well as potential solutions for privacy‐preserving genotype–phenotype linkage in biomedical research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.13259

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technical advancements of differential privacy allow organisations to share publicly a dataset while keeping information about individuals secret and can ensure provable privacy protection on sensitive data such as genomic data.

    “Technical advancements of this kind, which allow organisations to share publicly a dataset while keeping information about individuals secret (preventing re-identification), and can ensure provable privacy protection on sensitive data, such as genomic data (Wang et al. 2017).”

    From The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2017

  • A growing scholarship on differential privacy is providing new privacy protection methods for organisations looking to protect users' privacy while keeping good model quality and manageable software costs, striking a balance between utility and privacy.

    “Finally, a growing scholarship on differential privacy is providing new privacy protection methods for organisations looking to protect their users' privacy while also keeping good model quality, as well as manageable software costs and complexity, striking a balance between utility and privacy (Abadi et al. 2016;Wang et al. 2017;Xian et al. 2017).”

    From The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [44]Zhang Yuchen Dai Wenrui Wang Shuang SECRET: Secure Edit-distance Computation over homomoRphic Encrypted daTa 5th Annual Translational Bioinformatics Conference
  2. [59]iDASH Genome Privacy Protection Challenge Workshop 2015 Retrieved March 24, 2015 from http://www.humangenomeprivacy.org/2015/
  3. [61]Hayden Erika Check Cloud cover protects gene data Nature 2015 519 7544 400 401 25810184
  4. [92]Robinson Neil Graux Hans Botterman Maarten Valeri Lorenzo Review of EU data protection directive: summary Information Commissioner’s Office 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S., Jiang, X., Singh, S., Marmor, R., Bonomi, L., Fox, D., Dow, M., & Ohno‐Machado, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of San Diego (US)
  • Department of Biomedical Informatics University of California San Diego La Jolla California
Corresponding author
Wang, Shuang
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-28
Volume
1387
Issue
1
Pages
73-83
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2523884223
Cited by
78
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U54HL108460, R00HG008175, UL1TR001442, T15LM011271, R00LM011392, R21LM012060)
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CDRN‐1306‐04819)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
Keywords
genomic data sharing, privacy violations, data access control, electronic health records, research data access, United States
MeSH terms
Humans, Informed Consent, Medical Record Linkage, Risk Management, United States, Computer Security, Computational Biology, Genomics, Genetic Privacy, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review