Cited by 17Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsCleft Lip and Palate ResearchBone Metabolism and Diseases

Mouse models for the study of cranial base growth and anomalies

Vora, S. R.·2017·Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research

Abstract

The cranial base is a central and integral component of the cranioskeleton, yet little is known about its growth. Despite the dissimilarities between human and murine cranioskeletal form, mouse models are proving instrumental in studying craniofacial growth. The objectives of this review are to summarize recent findings from numerous mouse models that display growth defects in one or more cranial base synchondroses, with accompanying changes in chondrocyte cellular zones. Many of these models also display altered growth of the cranial vault and/or the facial region. FGFR, PTHrP, Ihh, BMP and Wnt/β-catenin, as well as components of primary cilia, are the major genes and signalling pathways identified in cranial base synchondroses. Together, these models are helping to uncover specific genetic influences and signalling pathways operational at the cranial base synchondroses. Many of these genes are in common with those of importance in the cranial vault and the facial skeleton, emphasizing the molecular integration of growth between the cranial base and other cranial regions. Selected models are also being utilized in testing therapeutic agents to correct defective craniofacial and cranial base growth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ocr.12180

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with cartilage growth defects in the cranial base often develop abnormal calvarial morphologies, malocclusion and concave faces.

    “For example, children with cartilage growth defects in the cranial base often develop abnormal calvarial morphologies, malocclusion and concave faces [43,44].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vora, S. R.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Vora, S. R.
Venue
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06
Volume
20
Issue
S1
Pages
18-25
ISSN
  • 1601-6335 (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-6343
OpenAlex
W2652038182
Cited by
17
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
cranial base growth, mouse model, FGFR signalling, parathyroid hormone-related protein, Ihh, BMP signaling, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, primary cilia, craniofacial growth, therapeutic testing
MeSH terms
Animals, Maxillofacial Development, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Skull Base, Models, Animal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review