Cited by 18Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchDigital Mental Health Interventions

Online pain management programs for chronic, widespread musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Open access
Chew, Min Tze, Chan, Cliffton, Kobayashi, Sarah, Cheng, Hoi Yan, Wong, Tsz Ming, Nicholson, Leslie L.·2023·Pain Practice

Abstract

Face-to-face pain management programs demonstrate positive clinical outcomes in the chronic pain population by improving pain intensity and attitudes, depression, and functional disability scores. The effects of this modality carried out online is less known, particularly in subgroups of chronic pain. This systematic review assessed the effects of online pain management programs in chronic, widespread musculoskeletal conditions on pain measurements (intensity, interference, coping, and catastrophizing), health-related quality of life, depression, and anxiety scores immediately post-intervention. Five electronic databases (Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and PEDro) were searched with 3546 studies identified. Eighteen randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Included studies had moderate methodological quality (using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool) but high risk of bias (using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2)). There were significant improvements in pain intensity (11 studies, 1397 participants, SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.10, p = 0.004), health-related quality of life (eight studies, 1054 participants, SMD 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.75, p = 0.02), and depression (nine studies, 1283 participants, SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.08, p = 0.008). However, effect sizes were small and did not meet their respective measure's minimal clinically important change score. Guided interventions (regular interaction with an instructor) appeared to be superior to self-completed interventions. Future research should standardize outcome measures for assessing pain, use active control groups, and analyze other outcome measures such as cost and long-term effects. This study was registered with Prospero on August 15, 2021 (CRD42021267565).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/papr.13227

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Guided internet-based ACT treatment has improved outcomes and higher rates of session completion compared to unguided treatment.

    “Improved outcomes and higher rates of session completion have been reported in guided internet-based ACT treatment compared to unguided treatment.37,38”

    From Design and implementation of online acceptance and commitment therapy with enhanced therapist support for chronic low back pain (ACT for PAIN) (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Main findings and clinical implications section reports that a trial comparing guided with self-completed internet-based ACT found no difference in pain interference or acceptance, contrary to the claimed improvement for guided ACT. Although the Self-completed versus guided section suggests guided online pain interventions may be more effective overall, the Completion rates section does not compare session completion for guided versus unguided ACT. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Treatment completion and engagement appear to be enhanced with therapist-guided involvement, which may also improve patient engagement.

    “In this growing body of research, treatment completion and engagement appear to be enhanced with therapist-guided involvement which may also improve patient engagement.”

    From Design and implementation of online acceptance and commitment therapy with enhanced therapist support for chronic low back pain (ACT for PAIN) (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

    The 'Self-completed versus guided' section reports that guided interventions appear more effective for clinical outcomes, but does not compare treatment completion or patient engagement. The 'Completion rates' section reports rates across studies without linking them to therapist guidance. Searches for therapist-guided completion and engagement found no passage establishing the claimed relationship; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Benjamin S, Morris S, McBeth J, Macfarlane GJ, Silman AJ. The association between chronic widespread pain and mental disor- der: a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(3):561-7.
  2. Deeks J, Higgins J, Altman D. Chapter 10: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. 2021. Cochrane. Available from: www.train ing.cochr ane.org/handbook
  3. Hedman-Lagerlof M, Hedman-Lagerlof E, Axelsson E, et al. Internet-delivered exposure therapy for fibromyalgia a random- ized controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(6):532-42.
  4. Page MJ, Higgins JP, Sterne JA. Chapter 13: assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis. 2021. Cochrane. Available from: http://www.train ing.cochr ane.org/handbook
  5. Lin J, Paganini S, Sander L, Lüking M, Ebert DD, Buhrman M, et al. An internet-based intervention for chronic pain: a three- arm randomized controlled study of the effectiveness of guided and unguided acceptance and commitment therapy. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2017;114(41):681-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chew, M. T., Chan, C., Kobayashi, S., Cheng, H. Y., Wong, T. M., & Nicholson, L. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Chew, Min Tze
Venue
Pain Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-04-13
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
664-683
ISSN
  • 1530-7085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-2500
OpenAlex
W4365444013
Cited by
18
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Macquarie University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
chronic widespread pain, musculoskeletal pain, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, pain coping, guided intervention, self-guided intervention, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Depression, Humans, Quality of Life, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review