Cited by 85Sleep and related disordersSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The patient experience of sleep problems and their treatment in the context of current delusions and hallucinations

Open access
Waite, Felicity, Evans, Nicole, Myers, Elissa, Startup, Helen, Lister, Rachel, Harvey, Allison G., Freeman, Daniel·2016·Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is increasing recognition that sleep problems are common in patients with psychosis, that they exacerbate delusions and hallucinations and should be a treatment target. The aim of this study was to gain a patient perspective on the nature of sleep problems in psychosis and experience of treatment. DESIGN: A qualitative, semi-structured interview-based study to explore patient accounts of sleep problems and associated psychological treatment. METHODS: Ten patients with recent delusions and hallucinations, who had experienced sleep problems and received psychological treatment during a clinical trial (the Better Sleep Trial), were interviewed. Responses were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. RESULTS: Patients reported experiencing problems of getting to sleep, staying asleep, too much sleep, nightmares, and erratic sleep patterns. These sleep problems caused emotional distress, fatigue, and reduction in daytime activities. Worry and psychotic experiences disturbed sleep, while consequent tiredness meant that patients coped poorly with voices and persecutory fears. Treatment for sleep problems was viewed very positively and considered to have wide-ranging impacts. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep disturbance is a major problem for patients with psychosis, which should be treated more often in services using evidence-based interventions. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Psychological interventions for sleep problems are valued by patients with psychosis. Patients with current distressing psychotic experiences report wide-ranging benefits from a brief psychological intervention for sleep problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/papt.12073

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Freeman, D., Waite, F., Startup, H., Myers, E., Lister, R., McInerney, J., … Yu, L.‐M. (in press). A randomi sed controlled pilot trial testing the effects of cognitive behavioural therapy to improve sleep for patients with persistent delusions and hallucinations: The Better Sleep Trial (BEST). The Lancet Psychiatry. PMC4641164 26363701
  2. Meir, H., & Kryger, M. (2004). A woman's guide to sleep disorders. New York, NY: McGraw‐Hill.
  3. Yardley, L. (2008). Demonstrating validity in qualitative health research In Smith J. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods (2nd ed., pp. 235– 251). London, UK: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waite, F., Evans, N., Myers, E., Startup, H., Lister, R., Harvey, A. G., & Freeman, D.
Affiliations
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Waite, Felicity
Venue
Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-18
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
181-193
ISSN
  • 1476-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8341
OpenAlex
W2106062833
Cited by
85
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • NHS NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Programme (PB-PG-0211-10007)
  • Medical Research Council Senior Clinical Fellowship (G0902308)
  • Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (098461/Z/12/Z)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
sleep disorders, psychosis, delusions, hallucinations, patient experience, psychological intervention, nightmares, fatigue, voice, treatment acceptability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Delusions, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Psychotic Disorders, Sleep Wake Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review