Cited by 27Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchCounseling Practices and Supervision

The therapeutic alliance in different mental disorders: a comparison of patients with depression, somatoform, and eating disorders

Mander, Johannes, Neubauer, Andreas B., Schlarb, Angelika, Teufel, Martin, Bents, Hinrich, Hautzinger, Martin, Zipfel, Stephan, Wittorf, Andreas +1 more·2017·Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The therapeutic alliance is intensively investigated in psychotherapy research. However, there is scarce research on the role of the specific diagnosis of the patient in the formation of the therapeutic alliance. Hence, the aim of this study was to address this research gap by comparing the alliance in different mental disorders. DESIGN: Our sample comprised 348 patients (mean age = 40 years; 68% female; 133 patients with depression, 122 patients with somatoform disorders, and 93 patients with eating disorders). METHODS: Patients completed the Working Alliance Inventory and measures of therapeutic outcome in early, middle, and late stages of inpatient psychotherapy. We applied multivariate multilevel models to address the nested data structure. RESULTS: All three disorder groups experienced positive alliances that increased across the course of therapy and showed similar alliance-outcome relations that were of comparable strengths as in current meta-analyses. However, we found perspective incongruence of alliance ratings from patient and therapist in the three disorder groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results generally indicate that the working alliance is of importance irrespective of the specific mental disorder. Perspective incongruence feedback of working alliance experiences could help to strengthen coordination between patient and therapist and thereby improve the therapeutic process. Further implications of these findings are discussed. PRACTITIONER POINTS: We found no differences in the strengths of alliance ratings and alliance-outcome associations in depressive, somatoform, and eating disorder patients. This indicates that the working alliance is of general clinical importance irrespective of the disorder group and should be a central target in all therapies. We found perspective incongruence in alliance ratings between patient and therapist in all three disorder groups. Perspective incongruence feedback of working alliance experiences could help to strengthen coordination between patient and therapist and thereby improve the therapeutic process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/papt.12131

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mander, J., Neubauer, A. B., Schlarb, A., Teufel, M., Bents, H., Hautzinger, M., Zipfel, S., Wittorf, A., & Sammet, I.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Mander, Johannes
Venue
Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-12
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
649-667
ISSN
  • 1476-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8341
OpenAlex
W2613854347
Cited by
27
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG MA6526/2‐1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, depression, somatoform disorders, eating disorders, inpatient psychotherapy, Working Alliance Inventory
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Somatoform Disorders, Psychotherapeutic Processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review