Cited by 80Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The links between adult attachment and post‐traumatic stress: A systematic review

Barazzone, Natalie, Santos, Ines, McGowan, John, Donaghay‐Spire, Eloise·2019·Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

Abstract

Purpose: The theory of attachment has informed our understanding of survival and well‐being throughout the lifespan. There is a growing interest in the relationship between attachment and symptoms of post‐traumatic stress ( PTS ). Emerging evidence points to important links between attachment and PTS , yet current theoretical and clinical understandings of PTS symptoms and attachment remain relatively disparate. The current systematic review aimed to synthesize, describe, and critique evidence demonstrating the links between attachment and PTS in adults. It also aimed to explore whether the relationship between attachment and PTS differs according to the nature of the traumatic event. Methods: Searches were conducted using Psyc INFO , the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Google Scholar to identify empirical studies focusing on PTS in adults. Results: Twenty‐one papers were identified. Attachment was shown to have moderating and mediating influences on the relationship between trauma and PTS . This varied according to the type of trauma, and how symptoms of PTS were reported across the different attachment styles. Methodological rigour varied across studies. Clinical and research implications are discussed, including the consideration of attachment security in assessment and formulation. Conclusions: Although findings were mixed, this review suggests that there is an important link between attachment and PTS . It supports the current emerging evidence demanding the development of a more unified theoretical framework for attachment, types of trauma, and symptoms of PTS . Practitioner points: The findings discussed in this review have important implications for the treatment of PTS symptoms. Consideration of attachment styles in formulations is likely to inform treatment plans. There is increasing evidence to suggest that assessing and accounting for attachment style in therapy may improve the chances of successful treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/papt.12181

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barazzone, N., Santos, I., McGowan, J., & Donaghay‐Spire, E.
Affiliations
  • Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
  • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Barazzone, Natalie
Venue
Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-30
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
131-147
ISSN
  • 1476-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8341
OpenAlex
W2795181625
Cited by
80
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
adult attachment, post-traumatic stress, attachment styles, attachment security, trauma type, mediating and moderating effects, attachment-based therapy, clinical formulation
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Psychological, Object Attachment, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review