Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of germ‐line‐specific CRISPR‐Cas9 systems to improve the production of heritable gene modifications in Arabidopsis

Open access
Mao, Yanfei, Zhang, Zhengjing, Feng, Zhengyan, Wei, Pengliang, Zhang, Hui, Botella, José Ramón, Zhu, Jian‐Kang·2016·Plant Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Summary: The Streptococcus‐derived CRISPR/Cas9 system is being widely used to perform targeted gene modifications in plants. This customized endonuclease system has two components, the single‐guide RNA (sg RNA) for target DNA recognition and the CRISPR‐associated protein 9 (Cas9) for DNA cleavage. Ubiquitously expressed CRISPR/Cas9 systems (UC) generate targeted gene modifications with high efficiency but only those produced in reproductive cells are transmitted to the next generation. We report the design and characterization of a germ‐line‐specific Cas9 system (GSC) for Arabidopsis gene modification in male gametocytes, constructed using a SPOROCYTELESS (SPL) genomic expression cassette. Four loci in two endogenous genes were targeted by both systems for comparative analysis. Mutations generated by the GSC system were rare in T1 plants but were abundant (30%) in the T2 generation. The vast majority (70%) of the T2 mutant population generated using the UC system were chimeras while the newly developed GSC system produced only 29% chimeras, with 70% of the T2 mutants being heterozygous. Analysis of two loci in the T2 population showed that the abundance of heritable gene mutations was 37% higher in the GSC system compared to the UC system and the level of polymorphism of the mutations was also dramatically increased with the GSC system. Two additional systems based on germ‐line‐specific promoters (pDD 45‐GT and pLAT 52‐GT) were also tested, and one of them was capable of generating heritable homozygous T1 mutant plants. Our results suggest that future application of the described GSC system will facilitate the screening for targeted gene modifications, especially lethal mutations in the T2 population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pbi.12468

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Mao, Y., Zhang, Z., Feng, Z., Wei, P., Zhang, H., Botella, J. R., & Zhu, J.
Venue
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-11
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
519-532
ISSN
  • 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7652
OpenAlex
W2136656609
Cited by
219
References
7
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of germ‐line‐specific CRISPR‐Cas9 systems to improve the production of heritable gene modifications in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pbi.12468
The paper
Mao, Y., Zhang, Z., Feng, Z., Wei, P., Zhang, H., Botella, J. R., & Zhu, J. (2016). Development of germ‐line‐specific CRISPR‐Cas9 systems to improve the production of heritable gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12468

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.