The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Agrobacterium‐delivered CRISPR/Cas9 system for high‐frequency targeted mutagenesis in maize
Open accessAbstract
Summary: CRISPR/Cas9 is a powerful genome editing tool in many organisms, including a number of monocots and dicots. Although the design and application of CRISPR/Cas9 is simpler compared to other nuclease‐based genome editing tools, optimization requires the consideration of the DNA delivery and tissue regeneration methods for a particular species to achieve accuracy and efficiency. Here, we describe a public sector system, ISU Maize CRISPR, utilizing Agrobacterium‐delivered CRISPR/Cas9 for high‐frequency targeted mutagenesis in maize. This system consists of an Escherichia coli cloning vector and an Agrobacterium binary vector. It can be used to clone up to four guide RNA s for single or multiplex gene targeting. We evaluated this system for its mutagenesis frequency and heritability using four maize genes in two duplicated pairs: Argonaute 18 (ZmAgo18a and ZmAgo18b) and dihydroflavonol 4‐reductase or anthocyaninless genes (a1 and a4). T 0 transgenic events carrying mono‐ or diallelic mutations of one locus and various combinations of allelic mutations of two loci occurred at rates over 70% mutants per transgenic events in both Hi‐II and B104 genotypes. Through genetic segregation, null segregants carrying only the desired mutant alleles without the CRISPR transgene could be generated in T 1 progeny. Inheritance of an active CRISPR/Cas9 transgene leads to additional target‐specific mutations in subsequent generations. Duplex infection of immature embryos by mixing two individual Agrobacterium strains harbouring different Cas9/gRNA modules can be performed for improved cost efficiency. Together, the findings demonstrate that the ISU Maize CRISPR platform is an effective and robust tool to targeted mutagenesis in maize.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes
Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2842 · Cited by 3,153
Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells
Wu, X., Scott, D. A., Kriz, A. J., Chiu, A. C., Hsu, P. D., Dadon, D. B., Cheng, A. W., Trevino, A. E., Konermann, S., Chen, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2889 · Cited by 944
Lawrenson, T., Shorinola, O., Stacey, N., Li, C., Østergaard, L., Patron, N., Uauy, C., & Harwood, W. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0826-7 · Cited by 551
Cited by
CRISPR/Cas system: recent advances and future prospects for genome editing
Manghwar, H., Lindsey, K., Zhang, X., & Jin, S. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.09.006 · Cited by 529
“The NHEJ frequently leads to random DNA indels at the cleavage position, whereas HDR executes the precise sequence insertion or gene replacement by adding a donor DNA template with sequence homology at the predicted DSB site [100].”
BackgroundCRISPR/Cas9‐mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in grape in the first generation
Wang, X., Tu, M., Wang, D., Liu, J., Li, Y., Li, Z., Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12832 · Cited by 367
Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Cas9 System
Arora, L., & Narula, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01932 · Cited by 367
Tripathi, J. N., Ntui, V. O., Ron, M., Muiruri, S. K., Britt, A., & Tripathi, L. (2019) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0288-7 · Cited by 357
One-step genome editing of elite crop germplasm during haploid induction
Kelliher, T., Starr, D., Su, X., Tang, G., Chen, Z., Carter, J., Wittich, P. E., Dong, S., Green, J., Burch, E., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0038-x · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Char, S. N., Neelakandan, A. K., Nahampun, H., Frame, B., Main, M., Spalding, M. H., Becraft, P. W., Meyers, B. C., Walbot, V., Wang, K., & Yang, B.
- Venue
- Plant Biotechnology Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-09-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257-268
- ISSN
- 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7652
- OpenAlex
- W2515143162
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Agrobacterium‐delivered CRISPR/Cas9 system for high‐frequency targeted mutagenesis in maize. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pbi.12611
- The paper
- Char, S. N., Neelakandan, A. K., Nahampun, H., Frame, B., Main, M., Spalding, M. H., Becraft, P. W., Meyers, B. C., Walbot, V., Wang, K., & Yang, B. (2017). An Agrobacterium‐delivered CRISPR/Cas9 system for high‐frequency targeted mutagenesis in maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.