Cited by 551CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesGenetically Modified Organisms Research

Induction of targeted, heritable mutations in barley and Brassica oleracea using RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease

Open access
Lawrenson, Tom, Shorinola, Oluwaseyi, Stacey, Nicola, Li, Chengdao, Østergaard, Lars, Patron, Nicola, Uauy, Cristobal, Harwood, Wendy·2015·Genome Biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The RNA-guided Cas9 system represents a flexible approach for genome editing in plants. This method can create specific mutations that knock-out or alter target gene function. It provides a valuable tool for plant research and offers opportunities for crop improvement. RESULTS: We investigate the use and target specificity requirements of RNA-guided Cas9 genome editing in barley (Hordeum vulgare) and Brassica oleracea by targeting multicopy genes. In barley, we target two copies of HvPM19 and observe Cas9-induced mutations in the first generation of 23 % and 10 % of the lines, respectively. In B. oleracea, targeting of BolC.GA4.a leads to Cas9-induced mutations in 10 % of first generation plants screened. In addition, a phenotypic screen identifies T0 plants with the expected dwarf phenotype associated with knock-out of the target gene. In both barley and B. oleracea stable Cas9-induced mutations are transmitted to T2 plants independently of the T-DNA construct. We observe off-target activity in both species, despite the presence of at least one mismatch between the single guide RNA and the non-target gene sequences. In barley, a transgene-free plant has concurrent mutations in the target and non-target copies of HvPM19. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the use of RNA-guided Cas9 to generate mutations in target genes of both barley and B. oleracea and show stable transmission of these mutations thus establishing the potential for rapid characterisation of gene function in these species. In addition, the off-target effects reported offer both potential difficulties and specific opportunities to target members of multigene families in crops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-015-0826-7

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawrenson, T., Shorinola, O., Stacey, N., Li, C., Østergaard, L., Patron, N., Uauy, C., & Harwood, W.
Affiliations
  • John Innes Centre (GB)
  • Murdoch University (AU)
  • Norwich Research Park (GB)
Corresponding author
Harwood, Wendy
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2015-11-30
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
258-258
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2176470754
Cited by
551
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 2
FWCI
20.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J004553/1)
  • John Innes Centre Innovation fund
  • John Innes Foundation
  • Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  • BBSRC and Engineering and Physics Research Council (EPSRC) Synthetic Biology Research Centre (BB/L014130/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
genome editing, barley, Brassica oleracea, inherited mutations, off-target effects, single guide RNA, multicopy gene families, GA4, dwarf phenotype, transgene-free plants, gene function characterization, crop improvement
MeSH terms
RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Hordeum, Brassica, Mutation, Phenotype, RNA Editing, RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida, Gene Targeting, Genome, Plant, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review