An adenine base editor with expanded targeting scope using SpCas9‐NG v1 in rice
Open accessAbstract
The CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system induces mainly small insertions or deletions at the target site. In contrast, base editors are precise genome editing tools that enable base conversion at a target site without inducing a DNA double-strand break. Two types of base editors have now been developed: cytosine base editors (CBEs)—cytidine deaminase fused with catalytically impaired Cas9—can efficiently convert a C–G base pair to a T–A pair, while adenine base editors (ABEs)—Cas9 nickase (nCas9) plus engineered Escherichia coli adenosine deaminase (TadA)—enable A–T to G–C conversions (Gaudelli et al., 2017; Kim, 2018). Both CBEs and ABEs have been applied successfully in plants such as Arabidopsis, wheat and rice (e.g., Hua et al., 2018, 2019; Li et al., 2018). However, potential base editing targets remain restricted by the requirement for protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences around these sites. Cas9 derived from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9)—currently the Cas9 most widely used for genome editing in many organisms—requires as a PAM an NGG sequence adjacent to the target site. To extend Cas9-recognized sites, several groups have engineered Cas9 variants with amino acid substitutions and modified PAM sequences. Using these Cas9 variants in base editors could expand the scope of base editing sites (Endo et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2018; Hua et al., 2019; Nishimasu et al., 2018). Engineered SpCas9s, SpCas9-NG variants and xCas9 variants that can recognize NG as PAM have been reported recently (Hu et al., 2018; Nishimasu et al., 2018). SpCas9-NG and xCas9 variants can induce mutation at target sites with NG PAMs in rice (Endo et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019), while the in vitro DNA cleavage activity of SpCas9-NGv1 (reported as ARVRFRR; Nishimasu et al., 2018), which includes a 7-aa mutation (R1335A/L1111R/D1135V/G1218R/E1219F/A1322R/T1337R) in the PAM-interacting domain, is higher than that of xCas9 (Endo et al., 2019; Nishimasu et al., 2018). SpCas9-NGv1 is also available for C–T base conversions as CBEs in rice (Endo et al., 2019). Here, we report the development of novel ABEs using nSpCas9-NGv1 (ABE7.10-nSpCas9-NGv1) and show that SpCas9-NGv1 can induce A–G substitutions at a target site containing NG as PAM in the rice genome. We first examined whether the ABE system can function in rice callus. We synthesized an Arabidopsis thaliana codon-optimized coding region containing TadA-wt-(XTEN)2-TadA*7.10-(XTEN)2 (Gaudelli et al., 2017). Then, A. thaliana codon-optimized nSpCas9 (D10A) and 3×NLS were fused to the C-terminus of the coding region (Figure 1a). We chose four target sites (sgOs-siteG1: chr05_27537337–27537356; sgOs-site2: chr05_27536662–27536681; sgOs-site3: chr02_19223102–19223121; and sgOs-site4: chr11_23944837–23944856) with NGG at their 3′ end as PAM in the rice genome (Figure 1b, c). A binary vector harbouring a single guide RNA (sgRNA) and ABE7.10-nSpCas9 expression cassettes was integrated into the rice genome via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. After culturing for 1 month, genomic DNA extracted from the transformed calli was subjected to cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences (CAPS) analysis. All four target sites have restriction enzyme sites overlapping the editing window of previously reported ABEs (Gaudelli et al., 2017; Hua et al., 2018). Undigested DNA fragments were detected in transgenic calli, suggesting that ABE7.10-nSpCas9 had indeed induced the desired mutation, and with roughly the same target window as other reported ABEs (Figure 1b). The ratios of mutated callus detected by CAPS analysis at the four different target sites were 81.7% (76/93 calli: site G1), 63.8% (51/80 calli: site G2), 68.5% (63/92 calli: site G3), and 69.3% (61/88 calli: site G4). DNA sequences around the target sites were confirmed using several transgenic calli in which undigested DNA fragments were clearly detected by CAPS analysis. Sequence analysis revealed that ABE7.10-nSpCas9 efficiently induced an A–G substitution at a position −16 to −13 nt upstream from the PAM (Figure 1c). This target window is almost the same as that seen in data reported previously in human and rice cells (Gaudelli et al., 2017; Hua et al., 2018). We detected no substitutions other than from A to G. These results showed that ABE7.10-nSpCas9 can direct A–G substitutions effectively at NGG PAM target sites. The newly engineered SpCas9-NGv1 can recognize NG as PAM, which increases the target sites available to Cas9-mediated genome editing (Endo et al., 2019; Nishimasu et al., 2018). To apply the SpCas9-NGv1 to the ABE system, we constructed ABE7.10-nSpCas9-NGv1 harbouring the nickase type of SpCas9-NGv1 instead of nSpCas9 (Figure 1a). We chose four target sites (sgOs-siteG1; sgOs-siteA: chr06_1770405–1770424; sgOs-siteC: chr04_33074491–33074510; and sgOs-siteT: chr06_2926795–2926814) in the rice genome with NGG, NGA, NGC and NGT, respectively, as PAM sequences (Figure 1d). Genomic DNA was extracted from ABE7.10-nSpCas9-NGv1
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Base editing technology empowers precise single-base substitutions without inducing double-strand breaks or requiring donor DNA templates.
“It empowers precise single-base substitutions without inducing double-strand breaks or requiring donor DNA templates (Molla et al., 2021; Negishi et al., 2019).”
From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Negishi et al., 2019
The paper’s opening discussion (page not provided) describes base editors as enabling precise base conversion without a DNA double-strand break, and its results report A–G substitutions in rice. Our copy does not explicitly state that base editing requires no donor DNA template, so that part of the attributed claim is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBase editors allow for direct base conversion without inducing double-stranded breaks.
“the base editors allow for direct base conversion without inducing double-stranded breaks”
From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Negishi et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage
Gaudelli, N. M., Komor, A. C., Rees, H. A., Packer, M. S., Badran, A. H., Bryson, D. I., & Liu, D. R. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24644 · Cited by 4,184 · see citing works
Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity
Hu, J. H., Miller, S. M., Geurts, M. H., Tang, W., Chen, L., Sun, N., Zeina, C. M., Gao, X., Rees, H. A., Lin, Z., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature26155 · Cited by 1,552 · see citing works
Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space
Nishimasu, H., Shi, X., Ishiguro, S., Gao, L., Hirano, S., Okazaki, S., Noda, T., Abudayyeh, O. O., Gootenberg, J. S., Mori, H., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9129 · Cited by 1,100 · see citing works
Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion
Li, C., Zong, Y., Wang, Y., Jin, S., Zhang, D., Song, Q., Zhang, R., & Gao, C. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1443-z · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Precise A·T to G·C Base Editing in the Rice Genome
Hua, K., Tao, X., Yuan, F., Wang, D., & Zhu, J. (2018) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.007 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Expanding the base editing scope in rice by using Cas9 variants
Hua, K., Tao, X., & Zhu, J. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12993 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Genome editing in plants by engineered CRISPR–Cas9 recognizing NG PAM
Endo, M., Mikami, M., Endo, A., Kaya, H., Itoh, T., Nishimasu, H., Nureki, O., & Toki, S. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0321-8 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Self-citationPrecision genome engineering through adenine and cytosine base editing
Kim, J. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0115-z · Cited by 108 · see citing works
xC as9 expands the scope of genome editing with reduced efficiency in rice
Wang, J., Meng, X., Hu, X., Sun, T., Li, J., Wang, K., & Yu, H. J. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13053 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Jeong, Y. K., Yu, J., & Bae, S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41356-1 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors
Molla, K. A., Sretenovic, S., Bansal, K. C., & Qi, Y. (2021) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00991-1 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Simplified adenine base editors improve adenine base editing efficiency in rice
Hua, K., Tao, X., Liang, W., Zhang, Z., Gou, R., & Zhu, J. (2020) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13244 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Base Editing in Plants: Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects
Azameti, M. K., & Dauda, W. P. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.664997 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Wu, Y., Ren, Q., Zhong, Z., Liu, G., Han, Y., Bao, Y., Liu, L., Xiang, S., Liu, S., Tang, X., et al. (2022) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13838 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops
Chavhan, R. L., Jaybhaye, S. G., Hinge, V. R., Deshmukh, A. S., Shaikh, U. S., Jadhav, P. K., Kadam, U. S., & Hong, J. C. (2025) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2025.1524767 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Negishi, K., Kaya, H., Abe, K., Hara, N., Saika, H., & Toki, S.
- Affiliations
- National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (JP)
- Kihara Institute for Biological Research (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kaya, Hidetaka
- Toki, Seiichi
- Venue
- Plant Biotechnology Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-30
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1476-1478
- ISSN
- 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7652
- PMC
- PMC6662097
- OpenAlex
- W2936252965
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plant Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Cabinet Office, Government of Japan
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Keywords
- adenine base editors, protospacer adjacent motif, targeted mutagenesis, single nucleotide polymorphisms, off-target effects
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Adenine, Oryza, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review