Cited by 108CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseasePlant Genetic and Mutation Studies

Simplified adenine base editors improve adenine base editing efficiency in rice

Open access
Hua, Kai, Tao, Xiaoping, Liang, Weiyi, Zhang, Zhaoxia, Gou, Runyu, Zhu, Jian‐Kang·2020·Plant Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Adenine base editors (ABEs) have been exploited to introduce targeted adenine (A) to guanine (G) base conversions in various plant genomes, including rice, wheat and Arabidopsis. However, the ABEs reported thus far are all quite inefficient at many target sites in rice, which hampers their applications in plant genome engineering and crop breeding. Here, we show that unlike in the mammalian system, a simplified base editor ABE-P1S (Adenine Base Editor-Plant version 1 Simplified) containing the ecTadA*7.10-nSpCas9 (D10A) fusion has much higher editing efficiency in rice compared to the widely used ABE-P1 consisting of the ecTadA-ecTadA*7.10-nSpCas9 (D10A) fusion. We found that the protein expression level of ABE-P1S is higher than that of ABE-P1 in rice calli and protoplasts, which may explain the higher editing efficiency of ABE-P1S in different rice varieties. Moreover, we demonstrate that the ecTadA*7.10-nCas9 fusion can be used to improve the editing efficiency of other ABEs containing SaCas9 or the engineered SaKKH-Cas9 variant. These more efficient ABEs will help advance trait improvements in rice and other crops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pbi.13244

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ABE-Plant version 1 Simplified (ABE-P1S) demonstrated higher editing efficiency in rice compared to the commonly used ecTadA-ecTadA*7.10-nSpCas9 (D10A) fusion.

    “The ABE-Plant version 1 Simplified (ABE-P1S) demonstrated higher editing efficiency in rice compared to the commonly used ecTadA-ecTadA*7.10-nSpCas9 (D10A) fusion (Hua et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hua, K., Tao, X., Liang, W., Zhang, Z., Gou, R., & Zhu, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhu, Jian‐Kang
Venue
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-19
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
770-778
ISSN
  • 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7652
OpenAlex
W2970076978
Cited by
108
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Keywords
adenine base editors, SaCas9, editing efficiency, rice, plant genome editing, protein abundance, crop breeding
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Adenine, Oryza, Genome, Plant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review