The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering herbicide resistance via prime editing in rice
Open accessAbstract
Although CRISPR-Cas9 has revolutionized our ability to generate site-specific double-strand breaks, precise editing of the genome remains challenging in most eukaryotes, including plants (Shan et al., 2013).In plants homology-directed repair is inefficient, limiting our ability to make precise edits of the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, the rice gene Oryza sativa acetolactate synthase (OsALS) was targeted to develop resistance to the herbicide bispyribac sodium (Butt et al., 2020).”
From Genetic resources and precise gene editing for targeted improvement of barley abiotic stress tolerance (2023) · cites this paper as Butt et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA
Anzalone, A. V., Randolph, P. B., Davis, J. R., Sousa, A. A., Koblan, L. W., Levy, J. M., Chen, P. J., Wilson, C., Newby, G. A., Raguram, A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 · Cited by 4,767 · cited 5×
“Researchers have developed several prime editing strategies: in PE1, wild type M-MLV RT fused to the C terminus of Cas9 (H840A) nickase; in PE2, Cas9 (H840A) with pentamutant M-MLV RT (D200N/ L603W/ T330P/ T306K/ W313F); in PE3, a PE2 prime editor with additional simple gRNA to simultaneously nick the non-edited stran…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTargeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system
Shan, Q., Wang, Y., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, K., Liang, Z., Zhang, K., Liu, J., Xi, J. J., Qiu, J.-L., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2650 · Cited by 1,810 · cited 1×
“Although CRISPR-Cas9 has revolutionized our ability to generate site-specific double-strand breaks, precise editing of the genome remains challenging in most eukaryotes, including plants (Shan et al., 2013).”
BackgroundBase editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells
Rees, H. A., & Liu, D. R. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0059-1 · Cited by 1,675 · cited 1×
“Moreover, cytosine and adenine base editors have serious drawbacks including lower efficiency, unclean edited sequence and the possibility of off-target mutations at other loci (Rees and Liu, 2018).”
BackgroundBoosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system
Xie, K., Minkenberg, B., & Yang, Y. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1420294112 · Cited by 1,557 · cited 1×
“We designed the sgRNA to target OsALS at a distance of +55 from the pegRNA and expressed this sgRNA from the OsU3 promoter using the polycistronic tRNA-gRNA system (Butt et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2015) (Figure 1a).”
MethodRegulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice
Shrivastav, M., De Haro, L. P., & Nickoloff, J. A. (2008) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2007.111 · Cited by 1,329
Prime genome editing in rice and wheat
Lin, Q., Zong, Y., Xue, C., Wang, S., Jin, S., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Anzalone, A. V., Raguram, A., Doman, J. L., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0455-x · Cited by 873 · cited 1×
“While this work was prepared for publication, similar findings were reported in pants (Li et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2020).”
ResultPrecise Modifications of Both Exogenous and Endogenous Genes in Rice by Prime Editing
Li, H., Li, J., Chen, J., Yan, L., & Xia, L. (2020) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.03.011 · Cited by 202 · cited 1×
“While this work was prepared for publication, similar findings were reported in pants (Li et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2020).”
ResultPlant Prime Editors Enable Precise Gene Editing in Rice Cells
Tang, X. D., Sretenovic, S., Ren, Q., Jia, X., Li, M., Fan, T., Yin, D., Xiang, S., Guo, Y., Liu, L., et al. (2020) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.03.010 · Cited by 194 · cited 1×
“While this work was prepared for publication, similar findings were reported in pants (Li et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2020).”
ResultAli, Z., Shami, A., Sedeek, K., Kamel, R., Alhabsi, A., Tehseen, M., Hassan, N., Butt, H., Kababji, A. M., Hamdan, S. M., et al. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0768-9 · Cited by 142 · cited 1×
“In plants, homology-directed repair is inefficient, limiting our ability to make precise edits of the DNA sequence (Ali et al., 2020; Butt et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEfficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing Using a Chimeric Single-Guide RNA Molecule
Butt, H., Eid, A., Ali, Z., Atia, M. A. M., Mokhtar, M. M., Hassan, N., Lee, C. M., Bao, G., & Mahfouz, M. M. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01441 · Cited by 137 · cited 4×
“A single amino acid change (W548L) in ALS results in a BS-resistant phenotype (Butt et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors
Molla, K. A., Sretenovic, S., Bansal, K. C., & Qi, Y. (2021) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00991-1 · Cited by 387
High-efficiency prime editing with optimized, paired pegRNAs in plants
Lin, Q., Jin, S., Zong, Y., Yu, H., Zhu, Z., Liu, G., Kou, L., Wang, Y., Qiu, J.-L., Li, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00868-w · Cited by 325
Prime editing efficiently generates W542L and S621I double mutations in two ALS genes in maize
Jiang, Y., Chai, Y., Lu, M., Han, X., Lin, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhou, Y., Wang, X., Gao, C., et al. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02170-5 · Cited by 281
“More recently, seven groups reported 40 applications of prime editors (PE) in rice and wheat, and six groups achieved prime-edited rice lines 41 [2-8].”
BackgroundTargeted genome-modification tools and their advanced applications in crop breeding
Li, B., Sun, C., Li, J., & Gao, C. (2024) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-024-00720-2 · Cited by 269
Application of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing for abiotic stress management in crop plants
Kumar, M., Prusty, M. R., Pandey, M. K., Singh, P. K., Bohra, A., Guo, B. Z., & Varshney, R. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1157678 · Cited by 251
“sativa OsTB1 AF322143 AgrobacteriumMediated (Butt et al., 2020)”
Metadata
- Authors
- Butt, H., Rao, G. S., Sedeek, K., Aman, R., Kamel, R., & Mahfouz, M.
- Affiliations
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Mahfouz, Magdy
- Venue
- Plant Biotechnology Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-06-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2370-2372
- ISSN
- 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7652
- PMC
- PMC7680537
- OpenAlex
- W3025159539
- Semantic Scholar
- 707270480172698cd9a447b013ee5db6c1cc92fa
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plant Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
- Keywords
- prime editing, herbicide resistance, rice, CRISPR/Cas9, genome editing, homology-directed repair, plant genome editing
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Oryza, Herbicide Resistance, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
