Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spray‐induced gene silencing for disease control is dependent on the efficiency of pathogen RNA uptake

Open access
Qiao, Lulu, Lan, Chi, Capriotti, Luca, Ah‐Fong, Audrey, Nino Sanchez, Jonatan, Hamby, Rachael, Heller, Jens, Zhao, Hongwei, Glass, N. Louise, Judelson, Howard S., Mezzetti, Bruno, Niu, Dongdong, Jin, Hailing·2021·Plant Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Summary: Recent discoveries show that fungi can take up environmental RNA, which can then silence fungal genes through environmental RNA interference. This discovery prompted the development of Spray‐Induced Gene Silencing (SIGS) for plant disease management. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of SIGS across a variety of eukaryotic microbes. We first examined the efficiency of RNA uptake in multiple pathogenic and non‐pathogenic fungi, and an oomycete pathogen. We observed efficient double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) uptake in the fungal plant pathogens Botrytis cinerea , Sclerotinia sclerotiorum , Rhizoctonia solani , Aspergillus niger and Verticillium dahliae , but no uptake in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides , and weak uptake in a beneficial fungus, Trichoderma virens . For the oomycete plant pathogen, Phytophthora infestans , RNA uptake was limited and varied across different cell types and developmental stages. Topical application of dsRNA targeting virulence‐related genes in pathogens with high RNA uptake efficiency significantly inhibited plant disease symptoms, whereas the application of dsRNA in pathogens with low RNA uptake efficiency did not suppress infection. Our results have revealed that dsRNA uptake efficiencies vary across eukaryotic microbe species and cell types. The success of SIGS for plant disease management can largely be determined by the pathogen’s RNA uptake efficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pbi.13589

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Qiao, L., Lan, C., Capriotti, L., Ah‐Fong, A., Nino Sanchez, J., Hamby, R., Heller, J., Zhao, H., Glass, N. L., Judelson, H. S., Mezzetti, B., Niu, D., & Jin, H.
Venue
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-04
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
1756-1768
ISSN
  • 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7652
OpenAlex
W3142705925
Cited by
320
References
56
FWCI
24.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spray‐induced gene silencing for disease control is dependent on the efficiency of pathogen RNA uptake. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pbi.13589
The paper
Qiao, L., Lan, C., Capriotti, L., Ah‐Fong, A., Nino Sanchez, J., Hamby, R., Heller, J., Zhao, H., Glass, N. L., Judelson, H. S., Mezzetti, B., Niu, D., & Jin, H. (2021). Spray‐induced gene silencing for disease control is dependent on the efficiency of pathogen RNA uptake. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13589

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.