Cited by 62Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingFood Industry and Aquatic Biology

Consumer acceptance of microalgae as a novel food‐where are we now? And how to get further

Open access
Olsen, Malene Lihme, Olsen, Karsten, Jensen, Poul Erik·2024·Physiologia Plantarum

Abstract

Microalgae provide a potential new food resource for sustainable human nutrition. Many microalgae species can produce a high content of total protein with a balanced composition of essential amino acids, healthy oils rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids, carotenoids, fibers, and vitamins. These components can be made available via unprocessed microalgae or refined as individual ingredients. In either case, if added to foods, microalgae may affect taste, smell, texture, and appearance. This review focuses on how consumer acceptance of new foods - such as microalgae - can be accessed in the world of sensory science by bringing together examples from recent consumer surveys. The main aim is to obtain an overview of the attitude towards microalgae as a food ingredient in Europe. The overarching finding suggests that European consumers generally find microalgae acceptable as ingredients in food products. However, there is a prevailing preference for keeping inclusion levels low, primarily attributed to the vivid green color that algae impart to food items upon addition. Additionally, consumers tend to favor the taste of freshwater algae over marine species, often finding the latter's pronounced fishy flavor less appealing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ppl.14337

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Persistent bottlenecks in inclusion of whole microalgae biomass include strong unpleasant flavors, dense cell walls that hinder nutrient bioaccessibility, and color changes.

    “However, persistent bottlenecks in the inclusion of whole biomass include strong, unpleasant flavors, dense cell walls that hinder nutrient bioaccessibility, and color changes (Olsen et al., 2024).”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Olsen et al., 2024

    The section on integrating microalgae in food products (p. 7) says intense color and unpleasant taste limit inclusion levels, and the Conclusion (p. 9) reiterates concerns about green color and fishy taste. The paper does not state that dense cell walls hinder nutrient bioaccessibility; a reference title on p. 9 mentions improved bioaccessibility after cell disruption, but that alone does not establish the claimed bottleneck. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The lack of clear and standardized regulations for the use of microalgae in food formulations limits their consolidation in the market, as well as the lack of consumer knowledge about microalgae and their health benefits.

    “Furthermore, it is worth emphasizing that the lack of clear and standardized regulations for the use of microalgae in food formulations limits their consolidation in the market, as well as the lack of consumer knowledge about microalgae and their health benefits (Lafarga et al., 2021; Olsen et al., 2024; Zhu et al., 2024).”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Olsen et al., 2024

    Section 6 (p. 5) reports that consumers lacked information about microalgae and that information about their nutritional advantages improved attitudes toward microalgae in food. Section 2 (p. 3) says EU approval is time-consuming and expensive, limiting approved species and products, but the paper does not identify a lack of clear, standardized regulations as the barrier. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reviews and discrete choice studies also indicate that acceptance is still conditional, presenting marked differences between countries and market segments.

    “Reviews and discrete choice studies also indicate that acceptance is still conditional, presenting marked differences between countries and market segments (Van der Stricht et al., 2023; Olsen et al., 2024; Hung et al., 2023).”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Olsen et al., 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kawai, T., & Sakaguchi, M. (1996). Fish flavor. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition , 36(3), 257 -298.
  2. How to cite this article: Olsen, M.L., Olsen, K. & Jensen, P.E. (2024) Consumer acceptance of microalgae as a novel food Where are we now? And how to get further. Physiologia Plantarum , 176(3), e14337. Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1111/ppl.14337

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olsen, M. L., Olsen, K., & Jensen, P. E.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Poul Erik
Venue
Physiologia Plantarum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-05
Volume
176
Issue
3
Pages
e14337-e14337
ISSN
  • 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3054
OpenAlex
W4396725979
Cited by
62
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiologia Plantarum (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond (1127‐00261B)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
Keywords
microalgae, novel foods, consumer acceptance, sensory perception, food ingredients, consumer attitudes, inclusion level, green, taste, fishy flavor, sustainable nutrition, essential amino acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids
MeSH terms
Consumer Behavior, Humans, Taste, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review