The DOI matches its Crossref record; 186 of the 186 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building a Conceptual Approach to Collective Learning: Lessons for Public Policy Scholars
Abstract
In public policy processes, collective learning among policy actors is important in shaping how these processes unfold and the types of policy outcomes that may result. Despite a widespread interest in learning by policy scholars, researchers face a number of conceptual and theoretical challenges in studying learning across different collective settings within policy processes. In this article, we offer a theoretically grounded approach to defining and understanding collective‐level learning. In defining learning, we first draw out the connection between learning processes and learning products, both cognitive and behavioral. In examining learning processes, we further explore the relationship between individual and collective learning. Then we identify and define the key characteristics of collective settings that will likely influence learning processes. We conclude by offering recommendations for policy scholars to apply this approach in studies of learning across diverse policy contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
(1983) · Cited by 33,192
(1999) · Cited by 28,356
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
Wenger, E. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803932 · Cited by 23,500
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization
Senge, P. M. (1991) · Performance + Instruction · doi:10.1002/pfi.4170300510 · Cited by 20,060
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
Perry, J., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3323801 · Cited by 11,225
Cited by
COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives
Weible, C. M., Nohrstedt, D., Cairney, P., Carter, D. P., Anderson, D., Durnová, A. P., Heikkila, T., Ingold, K., McConnell, A., & Stone, D. (2020) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4 · Cited by 602
Self-citationPolicy learning and policy change: theorizing their relations from different perspectives
Moyson, S., Scholten, P., & Weible, C. M. (2017) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1331879 · Cited by 313
Côté-Boileau, É., Denis, J.-L., Callery, B., & Sabean, M. (2019) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0482-6 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K.
- Venue
- Policy Studies Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 484-512
- ISSN
- 0190-292X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0072
- OpenAlex
- W2122834434
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 186
- FWCI
- 67.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building a Conceptual Approach to Collective Learning: Lessons for Public Policy Scholars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/psj.12026
- The paper
- Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a Conceptual Approach to Collective Learning: Lessons for Public Policy Scholars. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.