The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insect meals in fish nutrition
Open accessAbstract
Different studies have shown that insect meals can partially or completely replace the fish and soya bean meals that are commonly used in aquaculture. However, information is lacking on the amino acid and fatty acid contents and digestibility of different insect meals. Moreover, we evaluated different proportions of insect diets and determined how these affected the nutritional values of insect meals. Our purpose was to clarify these aspects and consider the availability of protein, amino acids, lipids and fatty acids in insect meals in fish nutrition. Generally, insect meals have higher indispensable amino acid contents than other meal types, with contents closely related to those in fish meal. Insect meal can be an important source of essential amino acids such as methionine, with contents ranging between 0.47 and 4.03 g 100 g−1 sample. These values are higher than those reported for other animal and plant meals. In addition, insects are also good sources of lipids and fatty acids, and the amounts and types of fatty acids vary according to the species, stage of development and type of feed. Moreover, the additional nutritional value of insect meal includes compounds such as chitin, which is primarily considered a fibre but also contains nitrogen and amino acids. Insect peptides with activity against pathogenic microflora provide secondary biological effects, which may significantly improve animal health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108 · Cited by 7,692
Francis, G., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (2001) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(01)00526-9 · Cited by 2,320
The Insects: Structure and Function
Matthews, R. W. (1971) · Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/besa/17.4.288 · Cited by 2,259
State of the art on use of insects as animal feed.
Makkar, H. P. S., Tran, G., Heuzé, V., & Ankers, P. (2014) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008 · Cited by 1,846
Utilization of plant proteins in fish diets: effects of global demand and supplies of fishmeal
Hardy, R. W. (2010) · Aquaculture Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02349.x · Cited by 1,175
Antimicrobial peptides in insects; structure and function
Bulet, P., Hetru, C., Dimarcq, J.-L., & Hoffmann, D. (1999) · Developmental & Comparative Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0145-305x(99)00015-4 · Cited by 1,041
Spranghers, T., Ottoboni, M., Klootwijk, C., Ovyn, A., Deboosere, S., De Meulenaer, B., Michiels, J., Eeckhout, M., De Clercq, P., & De Smet, S. (2017) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8081 · Cited by 970
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2016) · The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture · doi:10.18356/8e4e0ebf-en · Cited by 969
Review on the use of insects in the diet of farmed fish: Past and future
Henry, M., Gasco, L., Piccolo, G., & Fountoulaki, E. (2015) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.03.001 · Cited by 883
Janssen, R. H., Vincken, J.-P., van den Broek, L. A. M., Fogliano, V., & Lakemond, C. M. M. (2017) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00471 · Cited by 813
Cited by
Kaya, C., Generalovic, T. N., Ståhls, G., Hauser, M., Samayoa, A. C., Nunes-Silva, C. G., Roxburgh, H., Wohlfahrt, J., Ewusie, E. A., Kenis, M., et al. (2021) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-021-01029-w · Cited by 149
Ravi, H. K., Degrou, A., Costil, J., Trespeuch, C., Chemat, F., & Vian, M. A. (2020) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr8070857 · Cited by 144
Józefiak, A., Nogales-Mérida, S., Rawski, M., Kierończyk, B., & Mazurkiewicz, J. (2019) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s12917-019-2070-y · Cited by 93
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nogales‐Mérida, S., Gobbi, P., Józefiak, D., Mazurkiewicz, J., Dudek, K., Rawski, M., Kierończyk, B., & Józefiak, A.
- Venue
- Reviews in Aquaculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1080-1103
- ISSN
- 1753-5123 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-5131
- OpenAlex
- W2891022024
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 22.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
