Cited by 37Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHealth Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health services

Associations of Suicide Prevention Trainings with Practices and Confidence among Clinicians at Community Mental Health Centers

LoParo, Devon, Florez, Ivonne Andrea, Valentine, Nakia, Lamis, Dorian A.·2019·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether (1) behavioral health providers were more likely to implement best practices when they were more confident in their abilities, (2) number of suicide prevention trainings was positively associated with perceived confidence in abilities and implementation of evidence-based practices, and (3) specific trainings were more impactful than others on increasing providers' level of confidence and/or practices. METHOD: Providers (N = 137) at three rural community behavioral health centers who had opportunities to attend multiple suicide prevention trainings completed the Zero Suicide Workforce Survey, a measure to evaluate staff knowledge, practices, and confidence in caring for patients at risk of suicide. RESULTS: There was a moderate association between provider's practice and confidence. The number of attended trainings had a significant correlation with both practice and confidence. Particular trainings demonstrated differential effects on provider's practice and confidence. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that behavioral health providers who are confident in their skills in assessing and treating suicide risk are more likely incorporate best practices into their clinical work. Also, it appears there is a small but significant benefit to multiple trainings for increasing both practice and confidence among providers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12498

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LoParo, Florez, Valentine, and Lamis studied 137 mental health providers trained in CAMS, DBT, AMSR, and QPR and found that CAMS training was significantly more impactful on the outcome variable of clinical confidence to work with suicidal risk compared to other trainings.

    “The results of this investigation showed that the CAMS training—in comparison to other trainings—was significantly more impactful in terms of the outcome variable of “clinical confidence” to work with suicidal risk”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LoParo, D., Florez, I. A., Valentine, N., & Lamis, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA USA
  • Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (US)
Corresponding author
Lamis, Dorian A.
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-02
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
1148-1156
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2886956906
Cited by
37
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (1H9SM062896‐01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
suicide prevention training, clinician confidence, suicide risk assessment, evidence-based practice implementation, community mental health centers, training effects
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Community Mental Health Centers, Humans, Male, Psychiatry, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review