Cited by 714Personality Disorders and PsychopathologySuicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Dialectical Behavior Therapy for High Suicide Risk in Individuals With Borderline Personality Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Component Analysis

Linehan, Marsha M., Korslund, Kathryn E., Harned, Melanie S., Gallop, Robert J., Lungu, Anita, Neacsiu, Andrada D., McDavid, Joshua, Comtois, Katherine Anne +1 more·2015·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is an empirically supported treatment for suicidal individuals. However, DBT consists of multiple components, including individual therapy, skills training, telephone coaching, and a therapist consultation team, and little is known about which components are needed to achieve positive outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the importance of the skills training component of DBT by comparing skills training plus case management (DBT-S), DBT individual therapy plus activities group (DBT-I), and standard DBT which includes skills training and individual therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a single-blind randomized clinical trial from April 24, 2004, through January 26, 2010, involving 1 year of treatment and 1 year of follow-up. Participants included 99 women (mean age, 30.3 years; 69 [71%] white) with borderline personality disorder who had at least 2 suicide attempts and/or nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) acts in the last 5 years, an NSSI act or suicide attempt in the 8 weeks before screening, and a suicide attempt in the past year. We used an adaptive randomization procedure to assign participants to each condition. Treatment was delivered from June 3, 2004, through September 29, 2008, in a university-affiliated clinic and community settings by therapists or case managers. Outcomes were evaluated quarterly by blinded assessors. We hypothesized that standard DBT would outperform DBT-S and DBT-I. INTERVENTIONS: The study compared standard DBT, DBT-S, and DBT-I. Treatment dose was controlled across conditions, and all treatment providers used the DBT suicide risk assessment and management protocol. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Frequency and severity of suicide attempts and NSSI episodes. RESULTS: All treatment conditions resulted in similar improvements in the frequency and severity of suicide attempts, suicide ideation, use of crisis services due to suicidality, and reasons for living. Compared with the DBT-I group, interventions that included skills training resulted in greater improvements in the frequency of NSSI acts (F1,85 = 59.1 [P < .001] for standard DBT and F1,85 = 56.3 [P < .001] for DBT-S) and depression (t399 = 1.8 [P = .03] for standard DBT and t399 = 2.9 [P = .004] for DBT-S) during the treatment year. In addition, anxiety significantly improved during the treatment year in standard DBT (t94 = -3.5 [P < .001]) and DBT-S (t94 = -2.6 [P = .01]), but not in DBT-I. Compared with the DBT-I group, the standard DBT group had lower dropout rates from treatment (8 patients [24%] vs 16 patients [48%] [P = .04]), and patients were less likely to use crisis services in follow-up (ED visits, 1 [3%] vs 3 [13%] [P = .02]; psychiatric hospitalizations, 1 [3%] vs 3 [13%] [P = .03]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A variety of DBT interventions with therapists trained in the DBT suicide risk assessment and management protocol are effective for reducing suicide attempts and NSSI episodes. Interventions that include DBT skills training are more effective than DBT without skills training, and standard DBT may be superior in some areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00183651.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3039

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DBT is a gold-standard treatment for borderline personality disorder, which involves struggles with emotion dysregulation and distress tolerance.

    “DBT is a gold-standard treatment for those with borderline personality disorder, who struggle with emotion dysregulation and distress tolerance (Linehan, 2015; Linehan et al., 1991, 2015).”
  • In the component analysis study, all three treatment conditions resulted in similar improvements in frequency and medical severity of suicide attempts, suicide ideation, and use of crisis services.

    “Results from the component analysis study indicated that all conditions result in similar improvements in frequency and medical severity of suicide attempts, suicide ideation, and use of crisis services.”
  • A variety of DBT interventions could be useful for reducing suicidal behavior.

    “These results suggested that a variety of DBT interventions could be useful for reducing suicidal behavior.”
  • In the component analysis study, the two conditions with DBT skills training had statistically greater improvements in frequency of NSSI acts compared to the DBT individual therapy only condition.

    “The two conditions with DBT skills training had statistically greater improvements in frequency of NSSI acts compared to the DBT individual therapy only condition.”
  • Mindful meditation is a key strategy involved in MBT and multicomponent treatments such as ACT and DBT.

    “Finally, mindful meditation is a key strategy involved in MBT and multicomponent treatments such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) (Hayes, 2004) and Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) (Kliem et al., 2010;Linehan et al., 2015).”

    From A mixed methods study of autistic adults' mental health therapy experiences (2023) · cites this paper as Linehan et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linehan, M. M., Korslund, K. E., Harned, M. S., Gallop, R. J., Lungu, A., Neacsiu, A. D., McDavid, J., Comtois, K. A., & Murray-Gregory, A. M.
Affiliations
  • West Chester University (US)
  • United States Department of State (US)
Corresponding author
Linehan, Marsha M.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
475
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159212729
Cited by
714
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
67.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH034486)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, borderline personality disorder, suicide risk, skills training, individual psychotherapy, case management, non-suicidal self-injury, suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, depression, treatment dose, women, reasons for living, adaptive randomization
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Borderline Personality Disorder, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Single-Blind Method, Self-Injurious Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review