Cited by 10Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health via WritingIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The end of ambivalence. A narrative perspective on ambivalence in the suicidal process

Galasiński, Dariusz, Ziółkowska, Justyna·2024·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Suicidal ambivalence is a recognized phenomenon in suicidology, yet not much is known about it in the context of progression from suicidal ideation to action. The current study addresses this gap. We explore narrative dynamics of suicidal ambivalence in stories about transition from suicidal ideation to action. METHODS: We employ an experiential qualitative approach to gain in-depth understanding of narrated experience of suicidal ambivalence. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 patients hospitalized after a suicide attempt. For a detailed analysis, we selected 11 interviews in which the interviewees' accounts spontaneously referred to their ambivalence about attempting suicide. We used a text-oriented version of Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) to analyze the semantics and syntax, as well as the functions of what was said within the local context, and the social actions thus accomplished. RESULTS: Our study shows primarily that ambivalence is not resolved. Rather, it is set aside and removed from the narrative and replaced by an action-focused narrative with no references to mental activities. CONCLUSION: We propose that ambivalence recedes and gives way to action and that qualitative research provides a useful evidence base for conceptualizing and understanding the role of ambivalence in transition from suicidal ideation to action.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.13101

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From qualitative studies, it is known that ambivalence does not have to be resolved in order to enter the transition phase; rather, for some individuals, ambivalence seems to be pushed aside at these moments.

    “From qualitative studies, it is known that ambivalence does not have to be resolved in order to enter the transition phase; rather, for some individuals, ambivalence seems to be pushed aside at these moments (58).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galasiński, D., & Ziółkowska, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Wrocław (PL)
  • Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
Corresponding author
Galasiński, Dariusz
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-06-07
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
888-899
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W4399432457
Cited by
10
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, narrative dynamics, suicide attempt survivors, critical discourse studies
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Suicide, Attempted, Narration, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review