Cited by 22Aging and Gerontology ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

What is new with old? What old age teaches us about inequality and stratification

Open access
Abramson, Corey M., Portacolone, Elena·2017·Sociology Compass

Abstract

Aging is remarkably unequal. Who survives to grow old in America and the circumstances they face once there reflect durable racial, socioeconomic, and gender inequalities that structure our lives from birth. Yet within the field of social stratification and mainstream sociology proper, examinations of the rapidly growing population of older Americans are often relegated to a "gerontological" periphery. This essay posits that the failure to place aging as a core concern in stratification and inequality is a missed opportunity. We argue for the importance of reintegrating studies on the stratification of aging and explain why such a move is necessary. Specifically, we posit that (a) examining the aging population is necessary for understanding American inequality because aging is an outcome that is ubiquitous yet highly stratified; (b) aging and being seen as "old" in a youth-focused society are stratifying processes in their own right; and (c) later life provides for analytical comparisons that are illustrative of how key mechanisms of inequality structure and stratify. After examining insights provided by a new wave of research on the aging U.S. population, we revisit the implications for understanding inequality and stratification in a graying and unequal America.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/soc4.12450

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bourdieu P 1992 The logic of practice Stanford, CA Stanford University Press
  2. Estes CL Biggs S Phillipson C 2003 Social theory, social policy, and ageing: Critical perspectives Berkshire, UK Open University Press
  3. Estes CL Zulman DM 2001 Informalization of long term caregiving: A gender lens Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  4. Harrington Meyer M 2014 Grandmas at work New York City NYU Press
  5. Klinenberg E 2002 Heat wave: A social autopsy of disaster in Chicago Chicago Chicago University Press 12584383
  6. Kuhn M 1977 Maggie Kuhn on aging Philadelphia The Westminster Press
  7. Kuhn M 1978a Open letter Gerontologist 18 5 422 424 263558
  8. Lee R Orszag PR Auerbach AJ Charles KK Coile CC Gale W Kinsella K 2015 The growing gap in life expectancy by income: Implications for federal programs and policy responses Washington, DC The National Academy Press 26468563
  9. Portacolone E 2015 Older Americans living alone: The influence of resources and intergenerational integration on inequality Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 44 280 305
  10. Smedley BD Stith AY Nelson AR 2002 Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care Washington D.C National Academies Press 25032386
  11. Tilly C 1999 Durable inequality Berkeley University of California Press
  12. Torres S n.d Where everybody may not know your name: The importance of elastic ties Under Review

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abramson, C. M., & Portacolone, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Abramson, Corey M.
Venue
Sociology Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
ISSN
1751-9020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593782453
Cited by
22
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sociology Compass (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute Aging (NIA), National Institutes of Health (NIH) (EP K01AG049102)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
aging, social stratification, inequality, older Americans, racial inequality, socioeconomic disparities, gender inequality, old age, gerontology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review