Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Publicising Food: Big Data, Precision Agriculture, and Co‐Experimental Techniques of Addition

Carolan, Michael·2017·Sociologia Ruralis

Abstract

This article draws upon data taken from the following: 18 interviews of Iowa farmers who utilise big data when making farm management decisions; 14 interviews of those engaged within big data industry, those involved in the sale and promotion of large‐scale data acquisition, predictive analytic software, and/or precision agriculture technologies for conventional agriculture applications; and 19 interviews of regional food system entrepreneurs, those looking to create and encourage the adoption of technological platforms that enhance the capacities of regional food systems. A central aim of this article is to help reshape the debate around agro food‐based technologies, from one that asks what technology is to one that looks at what these socio‐technical forms engender. As described, alternative foodscapes are not looking for alternatives to technology but rather to technologies that engender specific effects. The empirical findings are organised around three themes that emerged out of the qualitative interviews. The technological assemblages investigated all exhibited the following three engendering qualities, which are (1) anticipatory, (2) moralising, and (3) a movement that multiplies absent presences. Precisely how these qualities were expressed, however, varied greatly across foodscapes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/soru.12120

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1177/0309132510362600 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Berry W., 2015, The unsettling of America: culture and agriculture
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/soru.12020 · DOI
  5. 10.4324/9781315765532-8 · doi:10.4324/9781315765532-8
  6. Carolan M.(2015b) Adventurous food futures: Knowing about alternatives is no enough we need to feel them. Agriculture and Human Values DOI:10.1007/s10460-015-9629-4 published online July 2015 · DOI
  7. Carolan M.andD.Stuart(2014) Get real: Climate change and all that “It” Entails. Sociologia Ruralis DOI:10.1111/soru.12067 published online November 2014 · doi:10.1111/soru.12067
  8. 10.1086/680090 · DOI
  9. Cochrane W., 1958, Farm prices, myths and reality
  10. Cook G., 2012, Greenpeace International
  11. Cukier K., 2013, The rise of big data, Foreign Affairs, 92, 27
  12. Deleuze G., 1992, Postscript on the society of control
  13. Dewey J. (, 1946, The public and its problems
  14. Foucault M., 2007, Security, territory and population. Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978
  15. Geertz C., 1973, The interpretation of cultures: selected essays, 3
  16. 10.1086/676646 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Glaser B, 2012, The discovery of grounded theory
  18. HabermasJ.1987.Theory of Communicative Action(Boston MA: Beacon Press)
  19. Khosla R., 2013, Precision agriculture and global food security
  20. 10.1177/2043820613513388 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Latour B., 1992, Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change, 225
  23. 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00107.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lyon D., 2014, Surveillance, snowden, and big data: capacities, consequences, critique, Big Data ands Society, 1
  25. Lyson T., 2004, Civic agriculture: reconnecting farm, food, and community
  26. Marks J., 2005, The Deleuze Dictionary, 55
  27. Marres N.(2012)Material participation: technology the environment and everyday publics(Basingstoke UK: Palgrave Macmillan) · DOI · Paper page
  28. Massey B., 2007, World city
  29. Massumi B., 2002, Hope: new philosophies for change, 210
  30. 10.1353/tae.2007.0066 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/s10460-013-9477-z · DOI
  32. 10.1017/CBO9780511488856 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/1468-2427.12052 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/soru.12115 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s11119-009-9155-8 · DOI
  36. Stengers I., 2000, The invention of modern science
  37. 10.4324/9781315765532 · doi:10.4324/9781315765532
  38. USDA, 2015, Crop production practices for corn
  39. Winner L., 1986, The whale and the reactor: a search for limits in an age of high technology
  40. 10.2307/1243505 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1997.tb00650.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Carolan, M.
Venue
Sociologia Ruralis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
135-154
ISSN
  • 0038-0199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9523
OpenAlex
W2252830481
Cited by
252
References
2
FWCI
32.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF‐2013S1A3A2055243)
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA‐COL00725)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Publicising Food: Big Data, Precision Agriculture, and Co‐Experimental Techniques of Addition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/soru.12120
The paper
Carolan, M. (2017). Publicising Food: Big Data, Precision Agriculture, and Co‐Experimental Techniques of Addition. Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12120

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.