The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Follow the hand that feeds you? The effects of non‐governmental cash transfers on citizenship
Abstract
Cash transfers (CT) are increasingly used as fundamental components of countries' poverty reduction and social protection strategies. Yet not much is known about how these interventions shape beneficiaries' relations with the state and citizenship in general, and even less evidence is available on how CTs distributed by non‐state actors affect the aforementioned variables. This paper analyses how a non‐governmental universal unconditional mobile CT (a small‐scale universal basic income experiment), handed out by a foreign NGO in a rural Ugandan village, influenced citizenship. The article zooms in on effects on recipients' perceptions of the state and interactions with government representatives, where both could potentially yield repercussions on the broader social contract. The study implements matching techniques and social network analysis to explore how the transfer influenced citizenship over time. Results suggest that the CT generated a positive effect on the non‐state actor's legitimacy, without necessarily causing a lasting impact on the legitimacy of the state. Major impacts were recorded in the treatment village's ‘call‐to‐action’ network, highlighting patterns of change in beneficiaries' relations with local duty bearers, such as the crowding out of (multiple) local leaders by an external actor linked to the CT project. These findings confirm the possibility of inducing unintended effects in local communities through CT initiatives implemented by non‐state actors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In line with other studies that have examined the politics of SCTs in Uganda (Bukenya & Hickey, 2019; Grisolia et al., 2023; Nystrand et al., 2024; Nystrand & Yawe, 2024), accountability relations in the SAGE programme are shaped by social and political factors that determine communities' perceptions of their social and economic rights.”
From Citizens’ Claims‐Making and Navigating the Politics of Accountability in Social Cash Transfers in Uganda (2025) · cites this paper as Grisolia et al., 2023
Citations
Cites
Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching
King, G., & Nielsen, R. (2019) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2019.11 · Cited by 1,706
NGOs, States, and Donors Revisited: Still Too Close for Comfort?
Banks, N., Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.028 · Cited by 772
Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs
Levi, M., Sacks, A., & Tyler, T. (2009) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764209338797 · Cited by 729
Measuring Program Outcomes: Using Retrospective Pretest Methodology
Pratt, C. C., McGuigan, W. M., & Katzev, A. R. (2000) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/109821400002100305 · Cited by 611
Contextualizing citizenship in Uganda
Alava, H., Bananuka, T. H., Ahimbisibwe, K. F., & Kontinen, T. (2019) · Practices of Citizenship in East Africa · doi:10.4324/9780429279171-5 · Cited by 10
Research works printed but not linked: 86
- 10.1080/00220388.2015.1134780 · DOI
- Afrobarometer, 2021, Afrobarometer round 8: Summary of results for Uganda, 2019
- 10.1086/687578 · DOI
- 10.1080/17531055.2016.1270043 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-101929 · DOI
- 10.5040/9781350218369.ch-003 · DOI
- Ayliffe T., 2017, Social accountability in the delivery of social protection
- 10.1007/s12116-020-09303-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11127-014-0224-9 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315277653 · DOI
- Borgatti S. P., 2003, Dynamic social network modeling and analysis: Workshop summary and papers, 241
- 10.2139/ssrn.1643358 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01553.x · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781316678527 · DOI
- 10.1080/00220388.2015.1134775 · DOI
- Camacho L., 2014, The effects of conditional cash transfers on social engagement and trust in institutions: Evidence from Peru's Juntos program
- 10.7591/9780801470332 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12116-010-9083-7 · DOI
- 10.7591/9780801470349 · DOI
- 10.1332/policypress/9781447312529.001.0001 · DOI
- Cloutier M., 2021, Africa Development Forum
- 10.1525/luminos.49 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511492211 · DOI
- 10.5040/9781472593061 · DOI
- Dewachter, S., Bamanyaki, P., & Holvoet, N., 2019, Not quite what's on paper? Comparison between theoretical and actual information‐sharing networks in the Ugandan rural water service sector, Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance
- 10.1017/XPS.2014.31 · DOI
- 10.1080/13600818.2015.1065313 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0026749X17001056 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.020 · DOI
- Eyben R., 2006, Building effective states: Taking a citizen's perspective
- EPAR. (2017).Review of evidence on long‐term impacts of cash transfer program(EPAR Technical Report #359). University of Washington: Evans School of Public Policy and Governance Evans School Policy Analysis and Research (EPAR).
- Farrington J., 2007, Targeting approaches to cash transfers: Comparisons across Cambodia, India and Ethiopia
- 10.1111/j.1467-7679.1991.tb00175.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Gaventa J., 2010, NGO management: The Earthscan companion
- Gentilini U., 2019, Exploring universal basic income: A guide to navigating concepts, evidence, and practices
- Gentilini U., 2022, Social protection and jobs responses to COVID‐19: A real‐time review of country measures
- 10.1596/978-1-4648-0779-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-7908-2006-5_7 · DOI
- 10.1136/jech.2003.014530 · DOI
- 10.29375/01240781.2462 · DOI
- 10.1080/00220388.2015.1134778 · DOI
- Holma K., 2020, Practices of citizenship in East Africa: Perspectives from philosophical pragmatism
- 10.1017/S1537592714002151 · DOI
- Jennings M., 2008, Surrogates of the state: NGOs, development, and Ujamaa in Tanzania
- Jodar J., 2020, The state of the world's cash 2020—Cash and voucher assistance in humanitarian aid
- 10.1080/00220388.2015.1134772 · DOI
- 10.1002/jid.1538 · DOI
- 10.1111/ijsw.12046 · DOI
- 10.1177/0308275X03023002004 · DOI
- 10.3390/socsci10120447 · DOI
- Marshall T., 1950, Citizenship and social class
- 10.1080/17502977.2018.1482126 · DOI
- 10.1080/17531055.2013.811027 · DOI
- 10.1093/wbro/lky005 · DOI
- 10.1080/00220388.2015.1134781 · DOI
- 10.4314/ad.v33i4.57344 · DOI
- 10.1111/ijsw.12133 · DOI
- 10.1787/543e84ed-en · DOI
- Okidi J. A., 2006, Spatial disparities and development policy: 10th annual Berlin Workshop Series (2008), Agriculture and Development
- Osofian W., 2011, Conference on social protection for social justice, Brighton, 13
- 10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00424.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0032329203261100 · DOI
- 10.1080/00220388.2015.1134774 · DOI
- 10.1080/00220388.2012.658371 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100173 · DOI
- Republic of Uganda, 1997, Local Governments Act 1997
- Republic of Uganda, 2013, Principles of service delivery in Uganda's local governments
- 10.1007/s12116-017-9240-3 · DOI
- Roberts B., 2012, Poverty, conditional cash transfers and society, 1
- 10.1080/10576109508435970 · DOI
- 10.5040/9781350223721.ch-004 · DOI
- 10.1057/s41287-019-00223-5 · DOI
- Sacks A.(2012).Can donors and non‐state actors undermine citizens' legitimating beliefs?(World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6158). · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1555-2934.2009.01025.x · DOI
- 10.9783/9780812203936.51 · DOI
- Thompson L., 2011, Social movements in the global south: Comparative perspectives on IBSA
- 10.5040/9781350223721.ch-005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00220388.2019.1687879 · DOI
- 10.1177/0032329203261095 · DOI
- 10.1080/17531055.2016.1278324 · DOI
- Warren M. R., 2001, Social capital and poor communities, 1
- 10.1017/CBO9780511815478 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-7660.00119 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00931.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
El Assal, A. (2025) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.11237
“In line with other studies that have examined the politics of SCTs in Uganda (Bukenya & Hickey, 2019; Grisolia et al., 2023; Nystrand et al., 2024; Nystrand & Yawe, 2024), accountability relations in the SAGE programme are shaped by social and political factors that determine communities’…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Grisolia, F., Dewachter, S., & Holvoet, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Grisolia, Filippo
- Venue
- Social Policy & Administration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-04-11
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 976-992
- ISSN
- 0144-5596 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9515
- OpenAlex
- W4364363941
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Policy and Administration (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universiteit Antwerpen (UA‐BOF DOCPRO 2020‐2024, 42168)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Development › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
- Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
- Keywords
- cash transfers, citizenship, non-governmental organizations, universal basic income, unconditional cash transfers, state legitimacy, NGO legitimacy, social networks, local leaders, crowding out, unintended consequences, social contract, rural Uganda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Follow the hand that feeds you? The effects of non‐governmental cash transfers on citizenship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/spol.12914
- The paper
- Grisolia, F., Dewachter, S., & Holvoet, N. (2023). Follow the hand that feeds you? The effects of non‐governmental cash transfers on citizenship. Social Policy & Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12914