Cited by 92Ultrasound Imaging and ElastographySkin Protection and AgingAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

The influence of gender and age on the thickness and echo-density of skin

Firooz, A., Rajabi‐Estarabadi, A., Zartab, H., Pazhohi, N., Fanian, F., Janani, L.·2017·Skin Research and Technology

Abstract

Background The more recent use of ultrasound scanning allows a direct measurement on unmodified skin, and is considered to be a reliable method for in vivo measurement of epidermal and dermal thickness. The objective of this study was to assess the influence of gender and age on the thickness and echo-density of skin measured by high frequency ultrasonography (HFUS). Materials and methods This study was carried out on 30 healthy volunteers (17 female, 13 male) with age range of 24-61 years old. The thickness and echo-density of dermis as well as epidermal entrance echo thickness in five anatomic sites (cheek, neck, palm, dorsal foot, and sole) were measured using two different types of B mode HFUS, 22 and 50 MHz frequencies. Results The epidermal entrance echo thickness and thickness of dermis in males were higher than females, which was statistically significant on neck and dorsum of foot. The echo-density of dermis was higher in females on all sites, but was only statistically significant on neck. The epidermal entrance echo thickness and thickness of dermis in young age group was statistically higher than old group on sole and dorsal of the foot respectively. Overall, the skin thickness decreased with age. Conclusion High frequency ultrasonography method provides a simple non-invasive method for evaluating the skin thickness and echo-density. Gender and age have significant effect on these parameters. Differences in study method, population, and body site likely account fo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/srt.12294

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Firooz, A., Rajabi‐Estarabadi, A., Zartab, H., Pazhohi, N., Fanian, F., & Janani, L.
Affiliations
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Center for Research & Training in Skin Diseases & Leprosy Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
Corresponding author
Rajabi‐Estarabadi, A.
Venue
Skin Research and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-08
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
13-20
ISSN
  • 0909-752X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0846
OpenAlex
W2411195799
Cited by
92
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Skin Research and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
skin thickness, high-frequency ultrasound, gender differences, age effects, skin aging, epidermis, dermis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Densitometry, Female, Humans, Iran, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Characteristics, Skin, Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of Results, Skin Aging, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review