Cited by 95Color Science and Applicationsmelanin and skin pigmentationCategorization, perception, and language

Characterising the variations in ethnic skin colours: a new calibrated data base for human skin

Open access
Xiao, K., Yates, J. M., Zardawi, F., Sueeprasan, S., Liao, N., Gill, L., Li, C., Wuerger, S.·2017·Skin Research and Technology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate skin colour measurements are important for numerous medical applications including the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous disorders and the provision of maxillofacial soft tissue prostheses. METHODS: In this study, we obtained accurate skin colour measurements from four different ethnic groups (Caucasian, Chinese, Kurdish, Thai) and at four different body locations (Forehead, cheek, inner arm, back of hand) with a view of establishing a new skin colour database for medical and cosmetic applications. Skin colours are measured using a spectrophotometer and converted to a device-independent standard colour appearance space (CIELAB) where skin colour is expressed as values along the three dimensions: Lightness L*, Redness a* and Yellowness b*. Skin colour differences and variation are then evaluated as a function of ethnicity and body location. RESULTS: We report three main results: (1) When plotted in a standard colour appearance space (CIELAB), skin colour distributions for the four ethnic groups overlap significantly, although there are systematic mean differences. Between ethnicities, the most significant skin colour differences occur along the yellowness dimension, with Thai skin exhibiting the highest yellowness (b*) value and Caucasian skin the lowest value. Facial redness (a*) is invariant across the four ethnic groups. (2) Between different body locations, there are significant variations in redness (a*), with the forehead showing the highest redness value and the inner arm the lowest. (3) The colour gamut is smallest in the Chinese sample and largest in the Caucasian sample, with the Chinese gamut lying entirely the Caucasian gamut. Similarly, the largest variability in skin tones is found in the Caucasian group, and the smallest in the Chinese group. CONCLUSION: Broadly speaking, skin colour variation can be explained by two main factors: individual differences in lightness and yellowness are mostly due to ethnicity, whereas differences in redness are primarily due to different body locations. Variations in lightness are more idiosyncratic probably reflecting the large influence of environmental factors such as exposure to sun.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/srt.12295

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exercise-based heart rate monitoring was most affected by skin-tone bias, while resting heart rate accuracy was generally preserved.

    “When stratified by outcomes, exercise-based heart rate monitoring was most affected by skin-tone bias, while resting heart rate accuracy was generally preserved [12-14].”

    From Photoplethysmography in Diverse Skin Tones: Evaluating Bias in Smartwatch Health Monitoring (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results and Samples and protocol sections describe spectrophotometer measurements of skin colour, not heart-rate monitoring. Searches for exercise, resting heart rate, wearable monitoring and photoplethysmography found no passage addressing the claimed difference in accuracy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Fitzpatrick Skin Type Scale has large within-group variations of skin tone.

    “weak correlation with skin color, and large within-group variations of skin tone4,7,8”
  • The Fitzpatrick Skin Type Scale has a weak correlation with skin color.

    “weak correlation with skin color, and large within-group variations of skin tone4,7,8”
  • These pulse oximeters have probably been calibrated on a population sample with light-skin pigmentation, which miss relevant interaction effects of confounding variables and skin pigmentation.

    “Besides, these pulse oximeters have probably been calibrated on a population sample with light-skin pigmentation, which miss relevant interaction effects of confounding variables and skin pigmentation [23,33,109].”
  • The FST phototype designation with six categories has only a weak correlation with skin color, with large within-group variance of skin tone.

    “The phototype designation with six categories has been shown to have only a weak correlation with skin color with large within-group variance of skin tone [13, 15, 16].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Edwards E, Duntley S. The pig- ment and color living human skin. Am J Anat 1939; 65: 1-33.
  2. Nasrabadi A, Haddadnia J. Skin color segmentation by Fuzzy Filter. Int J Comp Electr Eng 2010; 2: 1039-1042.
  3. CIE. Colorimetry, 3rd edition. Publication CIE 15:2004, ISBN 3- 901-906-33-9. Vienna, Austria: Commission Internationale De L'eclairage, 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, K., Yates, J. M., Zardawi, F., Sueeprasan, S., Liao, N., Gill, L., Li, C., & Wuerger, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology Liaoning (CN)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Sulaimani (IQ)
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Wuerger, S.
Venue
Skin Research and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-08
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
21-29
ISSN
  • 0909-752X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0846
OpenAlex
W2414757500
Cited by
95
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Skin Research and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Academy of Engineering (RECI033)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K040057/1)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61078048)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Color Science and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
skin colour, ethnic differences, CIELAB, skin redness, skin yellowness, skin lightness, body location, color gamut, spectrophotometry, sun exposure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Calibration, Colorimetry, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Skin Pigmentation, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review