Cited by 85Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInnovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical Education

The expert patient as teacher: an interprofessional health mentors programme

Towle, Angela, Brown, Hilary, Hofley, Chris, Kerston, R Paul, Lyons, Heather, Walsh, Charles·2014·The Clinical Teacher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To meet future health care needs, medical education must increase the emphasis on chronic illness care, interprofessional teamwork, and working in partnership with patients and families. One way to address these needs is to involve patients as teachers in longitudinal interprofessional educational programmes grounded in principles of patient-professional partnerships and shared decision-making. CONTEXT: The University of British Columbia has a history of initiatives designed to bring patient and community voices into health professional education. Increasing opportunities for interprofessional education has become important because of accreditation requirements. INNOVATION: We describe preliminary findings from a 3-year pilot of an interprofessional Health Mentors programme, an elective patient-as-teacher initiative in which groups of four students from different disciplines learn together, with and from a mentor with a chronic condition (an 'expert by experience') over three semesters. The goals, achieved through six themed meetings and a symposium, are to learn about living with a chronic condition from the patient's perspective and to develop interprofessional competencies. Groups are given suggested topics for each meeting, but function as self-managed learning communities, and are encouraged to explore their own questions. Faculty members support direct learning between students and mentors through setting broad objectives and responding to the student reflections written after each group meeting. Students and mentors rate the programme highly, and a wide range of important learning outcomes have been documented. Medical education must increase the emphasis on chronic illness care, working in partnership with patients IMPLICATIONS: Key characteristics, generalisable to other educational programmes, include the role of faculty staff in supporting learning between students and patients, a minimalist structure to promote ownership and creativity, and flexible delivery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tct.12222

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cited rationale was to introduce students to chronic illness care.

    “to introduce students to chronic illness care29–31;”
  • Exposure to patient educators from within specific patient or minority groups helped students increase positive attitude towards chronic conditions and elderly, patients with mental health problems or disabilities.

    “Exposure to patient educators from within specific patient or minority groups helped students increase positive attitude towards chronic conditions and elderly,27 31 patients with mental health problems29 or disabilities.48”
  • Initially, mentors were commonly anxious and unsure about whether what they shared was of benefit to students.

    “Initially, mentors were commonly anxious and unsure about whether what they shared was of benefit to students.29”
  • The most cited interaction between patient organisations and medical faculties was the use of patient organisations and their networks for the recruitment of individual patients as community members or members of condition-specific support groups.

    “The most cited interaction between patient organisations and medical faculties was the use of patient organisations and their networks for the recruitment of individual patients as community members or members of condition-specific support groups.24 28 29 36 49 55 56 60 69”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Towle, A., Brown, H., Hofley, C., Kerston, R. P., Lyons, H., & Walsh, C.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Towle, Angela
Venue
The Clinical Teacher
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-10
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
301-306
ISSN
  • 1743-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-498X
OpenAlex
W2131997940
Cited by
85
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Clinical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
patient as teacher, interprofessional education, chronic care, expert by experience, patient-professional partnership, shared decision-making, interprofessional competencies, medical students
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, British Columbia, Chronic Disease, Curriculum, Decision Making, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Faculty, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Mentors, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Pilot Projects, Professional-Family Relations, Students, Medical, Cohort Studies, Program Evaluation, Patient-Centered Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review