The expert patient as teacher: an interprofessional health mentors programme
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To meet future health care needs, medical education must increase the emphasis on chronic illness care, interprofessional teamwork, and working in partnership with patients and families. One way to address these needs is to involve patients as teachers in longitudinal interprofessional educational programmes grounded in principles of patient-professional partnerships and shared decision-making. CONTEXT: The University of British Columbia has a history of initiatives designed to bring patient and community voices into health professional education. Increasing opportunities for interprofessional education has become important because of accreditation requirements. INNOVATION: We describe preliminary findings from a 3-year pilot of an interprofessional Health Mentors programme, an elective patient-as-teacher initiative in which groups of four students from different disciplines learn together, with and from a mentor with a chronic condition (an 'expert by experience') over three semesters. The goals, achieved through six themed meetings and a symposium, are to learn about living with a chronic condition from the patient's perspective and to develop interprofessional competencies. Groups are given suggested topics for each meeting, but function as self-managed learning communities, and are encouraged to explore their own questions. Faculty members support direct learning between students and mentors through setting broad objectives and responding to the student reflections written after each group meeting. Students and mentors rate the programme highly, and a wide range of important learning outcomes have been documented. Medical education must increase the emphasis on chronic illness care, working in partnership with patients IMPLICATIONS: Key characteristics, generalisable to other educational programmes, include the role of faculty staff in supporting learning between students and patients, a minimalist structure to promote ownership and creativity, and flexible delivery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cited rationale was to introduce students to chronic illness care.
“to introduce students to chronic illness care29–31;”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
Exposure to patient educators from within specific patient or minority groups helped students increase positive attitude towards chronic conditions and elderly, patients with mental health problems or disabilities.
“Exposure to patient educators from within specific patient or minority groups helped students increase positive attitude towards chronic conditions and elderly,27 31 patients with mental health problems29 or disabilities.48”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
Initially, mentors were commonly anxious and unsure about whether what they shared was of benefit to students.
“Initially, mentors were commonly anxious and unsure about whether what they shared was of benefit to students.29”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
The most cited interaction between patient organisations and medical faculties was the use of patient organisations and their networks for the recruitment of individual patients as community members or members of condition-specific support groups.
“The most cited interaction between patient organisations and medical faculties was the use of patient organisations and their networks for the recruitment of individual patients as community members or members of condition-specific support groups.24 28 29 36 49 55 56 60 69”
From Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
Shared decision making — The pinnacle of patient-centered care
Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1109283 · Cited by 3,433 · see citing works
Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature
Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00098-8 · Cited by 2,993 · see citing works
Mentoring Relations: A Definition to Advance Research and Practice
Healy, C. C., & Welchert, A. J. (1990) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x019009017 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Patients as educators: interprofessional learning for patient-centred care
Towle, A., & Godolphin, W. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.737966 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationTransforming chronic illness care education: a longitudinal interprofessional mentorship curriculum
Collins, L., Arenson, C., Jerpbak, C., Kane, P., Dressel, R., & Antony, R. (2011) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.3109/13561820.2011.552815 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Doucet, S. A., Andrews, C., Godden-Webster, A. L., Lauckner, H. M., & Nasser, S. (2012) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.680631 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Stewart, T. J., & Alford, C. (2006) · Gerontology & Geriatrics Education · doi:10.1300/j021v27n02_02 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Neglect of Chronic Disease Self-Management in Medical Education: Involving Patients as Educators
Towle, A., & Godolphin, W. J. (2011) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3182308d25 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review
Dijk, S. W., Duijzer, E. J., & Wienold, M. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037217 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Gordon, M., Gupta, S., Thornton, D., Reid, M., Mallen, E., & Melling, A. (2020) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2019.1652731 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
How patient educators help students to learn: an exploratory study
Cheng, P. T. M., & Towle, A. (2017) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2017.1270426 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Towle, A., Brown, H., Hofley, C., Kerston, R. P., Lyons, H., & Walsh, C.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Towle, Angela
- Venue
- The Clinical Teacher
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 301-306
- ISSN
- 1743-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-498X
- OpenAlex
- W2131997940
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Clinical Teacher (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Keywords
- patient as teacher, interprofessional education, chronic care, expert by experience, patient-professional partnership, shared decision-making, interprofessional competencies, medical students
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, British Columbia, Chronic Disease, Curriculum, Decision Making, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Faculty, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Mentors, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Pilot Projects, Professional-Family Relations, Students, Medical, Cohort Studies, Program Evaluation, Patient-Centered Care, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review