Cited by 58Child Nutrition and Water AccessFood Safety and HygieneParasites and Host Interactions

Does targeting children with hygiene promotion messages work? the effect of handwashing promotion targeted at children, on diarrhoea, soil-transmitted helminth infections and behaviour change, in low- and middle-income countries

Open access
Watson, Julie A., Ensink, Jeroen H. J., Ramos, Monica, Benelli, Prisca, Holdsworth, Elizabeth, Dreibelbis, Robert, Cumming, Oliver·2017·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Objectives: To synthesise evidence on the effect of handwashing promotion interventions targeting children, on diarrhoea, soil‐transmitted helminth infection and handwashing behaviour, in low‐ and middle‐income country settings. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching eight databases, and reference lists were hand‐searched for additional articles. Studies were reviewed for inclusion according to pre‐defined inclusion criteria and the quality of all studies was assessed. Results: Eight studies were included in this review: seven cluster‐randomised controlled trials and one cluster non‐randomised controlled trial. All eight studies targeted children aged 5–12 attending primary school but were heterogeneous for both the type of intervention and the reported outcomes so results were synthesised qualitatively. None of the studies were of high quality and the large majority were at high risk of bias. The reported effect of child‐targeted handwashing interventions on our outcomes of interest varied between studies. Of the different interventions reported, no one approach to promoting handwashing among children appeared most effective. Conclusion: Our review found very few studies that evaluated handwashing interventions targeting children and all had various methodological limitations. It is plausible that interventions which succeed in changing children's handwashing practices will lead to significant health impacts given that much of the attributable disease burden is concentrated in that age group. The current paucity of evidence in this area, however, does not permit any recommendations to be made as to the most effective route to increasing handwashing with soap practice among children in LMIC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tmi.12861

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]13. World Health Organisation, The United Nations Children's Fund. End Preventable Deaths: Global Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Pneumonia and Diarrhoea. WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
  2. [31]31. Talaat M, Afifi S, Dueger E et al. Effects of hand hygiene campaigns on incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 537 Tropical Medicine and International Health volume 22 no 5 pp 526-538 may 2017
  3. [32]32. J. A. Watson et al. Does targeting children with hygiene promotion messages work? 13653156, 2017, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tmi.12861 by Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Wiley Online Library on [11/08/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License and absenteeism in schoolchildren, Cairo Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis 2011: 17: 619-625.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, J. A., Ensink, J. H. J., Ramos, M., Benelli, P., Holdsworth, E., Dreibelbis, R., & Cumming, O.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Save the Children (GB)
Corresponding author
Watson, Julie A.
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-31
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
526-538
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W2594826899
Cited by
58
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
Keywords
handwashing promotion, diarrhea, soil-transmitted helminthiasis, handwashing behavior, hygiene promotion, elementary school students, low- and middle-income countries, behavior change, soap use
MeSH terms
Child, Child Behavior, Developing Countries, Diarrhea, Hand Disinfection, Health Promotion, Helminthiasis, Humans, Hygiene, Soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review