The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The fate of duplicated genes in a polyploid plant genome
Abstract
Summary: Polyploidy is generally not tolerated in animals, but is widespread in plant genomes and may result in extensive genetic redundancy. The fate of duplicated genes is poorly understood, both functionally and evolutionarily. Soybean (G lycine max L.) has undergone two separate polyploidy events (13 and 59 million years ago) that have resulted in 75% of its genes being present in multiple copies. It therefore constitutes a good model to study the impact of whole‐genome duplication on gene expression. Using RNA‐seq, we tested the functional fate of a set of approximately 18 000 duplicated genes. Across seven tissues tested, approximately 50% of paralogs were differentially expressed and thus had undergone expression sub‐functionalization. Based on gene ontology and expression data, our analysis also revealed that only a small proportion of the duplicated genes have been neo‐functionalized or non‐functionalized. In addition, duplicated genes were often found in collinear blocks, and several blocks of duplicated genes were co‐regulated, suggesting some type of epigenetic or positional regulation. We also found that transcription factors and ribosomal protein genes were differentially expressed in many tissues, suggesting that the main consequence of polyploidy in soybean may be at the regulatory level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Design and Analysis of RNA Sequencing Data
Auer, P. L., & Doerge, R. W. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.110.114983 · Cited by 393
Self-citation
Cited by
The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes
Liu, S., Liu, Y., Yang, X., Tong, C., Edwards, D., Parkin, I. A. P., Zhao, M., Ma, J., Yu, J., Huang, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4930 · Cited by 1,161
The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat
Ramírez-González, R. H., Borrill, P., Lang, D., Harrington, S. A., Brinton, J., Venturini, L., Davey, M., Jacobs, J., van Ex, F., Pasha, A., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar6089 · Cited by 1,018
Conant, G. C., Birchler, J. A., & Pires, J. C. (2014) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2014.05.008 · Cited by 301
De Storme, N., & Mason, A. (2014) · Current Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.002 · Cited by 288
Zhao, M., Zhang, B., Lisch, D., & Ma, J. (2017) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.17.00595 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Roulin, A., Auer, P. L., Libault, M., Schlueter, J., Farmer, A., May, G., Stacey, G., Doerge, R. W., & Jackson, S. A.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-22
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-153
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2110507826
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The fate of duplicated genes in a polyploid plant genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tpj.12026
- The paper
- Roulin, A., Auer, P. L., Libault, M., Schlueter, J., Farmer, A., May, G., Stacey, G., Doerge, R. W., & Jackson, S. A. (2013). The fate of duplicated genes in a polyploid plant genome. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.