The DOI matches its Crossref record; 245 of the 245 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: Cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance
Open accessAbstract
Plant speciation and diversification strongly rely on structural changes in the nuclear genome, both at the whole ploidy and individual chromosome level. Phylogenetic, comparative mapping and cytological studies have provided insights into the evolutionary mechanisms that shape the plant genome. These include major genome alterations, such as whole genome duplication and hybridization (auto- and allopolyploidy), but also comprise the concomitant or independent occurrence of minor chromosome changes, such as aneuploidization and dysploidy (inversions and translocations). Despite the relevance of chromosomal instability as a driver for genome evolution and adaptation, little is yet known about the cellular mechanisms and processes that actually underlie these modifications. Here, in this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of somatic and meiotic defects that lead to polyploidy or structural genome changes and discuss their relevance for plant genome evolution and speciation. In addition, we elaborate on the existence of stress-induced changes in chromosome and ploidy integrity in plants and their putative role in boosting adaptive genome evolution in hostile environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/boj.12385 · Cited by 9,555
THE ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (2009) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x · Cited by 4,854
The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla
The French–Italian Public Consortium for Grapevine Genome Characterization (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06148 · Cited by 3,767
Apg (2009) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · Cited by 3,627
Polyploid incidence and evolution
Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · Cited by 2,363
The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid
Comai, L. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1711 · Cited by 2,287
Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms
Jiao, Y., Wickett, N. J., Ayyampalayam, S., Chanderbali, A. S., Landherr, L., Ralph, P. E., Tomsho, L. P., Hu, Y., Liang, H., Soltis, P. S., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09916 · Cited by 2,226
Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J. W., Baird, S. J. E., Bierne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C. A., Buggs, R., et al. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x · Cited by 2,194
The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)
Velasco, R., Zharkikh, A., Affourtit, J., Dhingra, A., Cestaro, A., Kalyanaraman, A., Fontana, P., Bhatnagar, S. K., Troggio, M., Pruss, D., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.654 · Cited by 2,075
PATHWAYS, MECHANISMS, AND RATES OF POLYPLOID FORMATION IN FLOWERING PLANTS
Ramsey, J., & Schemske, D. W. (1998) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467 · Cited by 1,934
Cited by
On the relative abundance of autopolyploids and allopolyploids
Barker, M. S., Arrigo, N., Baniaga, A. E., Li, Z., & Levin, D. A. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13698 · Cited by 393
Robertson, F. M., Gundappa, M. K., Grammes, F., Hvidsten, T. R., Redmond, A. K., Lien, S., Martin, S. A. M., Holland, P. W. H., Sandve, S. R., & Macqueen, D. J. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1241-z · Cited by 212
Homoeologous Exchanges, Segmental Allopolyploidy, and Polyploid Genome Evolution
Mason, A. S., & Wendel, J. F. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.01014 · Cited by 212
Self-citationProhens, J., Gramazio, P., Plazas, M., Dempewolf, H., Kilian, B., Díez, M. J., Fita, A., Herraiz, F. J., Rodríguez-Burruezo, A., Soler, S., et al. (2017) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-017-1938-9 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- De Storme, N., & Mason, A.
- Venue
- Current Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 10-33
- ISSN
- 2214-6628 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039394799
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 245
- FWCI
- 20.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: Cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.002
- The paper
- De Storme, N., & Mason, A. (2014). Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: Cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Current Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.