The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future
Abstract
Summary: By inducing double‐strand breaks (DSB), it is possible to initiate DNA recombination. For a long time, it was not possible to use DSB induction for efficient genome engineering due to the lack of a means to target DSB s to specific sites. This limitation was overcome by development of modified meganucleases and synthetic DNA‐binding domains. Domains derived from zinc‐finger transcription factors or transcription activator‐like effectors may be designed to recognize almost any DNA sequence. By fusing these domains to the endonuclease domains of a class II restriction enzyme, an active endonuclease dimer may be formed that introduces a site‐specific DSB. Recent studies demonstrate that gene knockouts via non‐homologous end joining or gene modification via homologous recombination are becoming routine in many plant species. By creating a single genomic DSB, complete knockout of a gene, sequence‐specific integration of foreign DNA or subtle modification of individual amino acids in a specific protein domain may be achieved. The induction of two or more DSB s allows complex genomic rearrangements such as deletions, inversions or the exchange of chromosome arms. The potential for controlled genome engineering in plants is tremendous. The recently discovered RNA‐based CRISPR/Cas system, a new tool to induce multiple DSB s, and sophisticated technical applications, such as the in planta gene targeting system, are further steps in this development. At present, the focus remains on engineering of single genes; in the future, engineering of whole genomes will become an option.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases
Hsu, P. D., Scott, D. A., Weinstein, J. A., Ran, F. A., Konermann, S., Agarwala, V., Li, Y., Fine, E. J., Wu, X., Shalem, O., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2647 · Cited by 4,741
Wang, H., Yang, H., Shivalila, C. S., Dawlaty, M. M., Cheng, A. W., Zhang, F., & Jaenisch, R. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025 · Cited by 3,495
High-Frequency off-Target Mutagenesis Induced by CRISPR-Cas Nucleases in Human Cells
Fu, Y., Foden, J. A., Khayter, C., Maeder, M. L., Reyon, D., Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2623 · Cited by 3,292
Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system
Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S. Q., Sander, J. D., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., & Joung, J. K. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2501 · Cited by 2,937
An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing
Miller, J. C., Holmes, M. C., Wang, J., Guschin, D. Y., Lee, Y.-L., Rupniewski, I., Beausejour, C. M., Waite, A. J., Wang, N. S., Kim, K. A., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1319 · Cited by 1,051
Enhancing zinc-finger-nuclease activity with improved obligate heterodimeric architectures
Doyon, Y., Vo, T. D., Mendel, M. C., Greenberg, S. G., Wang, J., Xia, D. F., Miller, J. C., Urnov, F. D., Gregory, P. D., & Holmes, M. C. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1539 · Cited by 402
Targeted gene knockout by direct delivery of zinc-finger nuclease proteins
Gaj, T., Guo, J., Kato, Y., Sirk, S. J., & Barbas, C. F. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2030 · Cited by 306
Cited by
Svitashev, S., Young, J. K., Schwartz, C., Gao, H., Falco, S. C., & Cigan, A. M. (2015) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.15.00793 · Cited by 733
A CRISPR/Cas9 Toolbox for Multiplexed Plant Genome Editing and Transcriptional Regulation
Lowder, L. G., Zhang, D., Baltes, N. J., Paul, J. W., Tang, X., Zheng, X., Voytas, D. F., Hsieh, T.-F., Zhang, Y., & Qi, Y. (2015) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.15.00636 · Cited by 707
Genetic diversity is indispensable for plant breeding to improve crops
Swarup, S., Cargill, E. J., Crosby, K., Flagel, L., Kniskern, J., & Glenn, K. C. (2021) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20377 · Cited by 423
Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Cas9 System
Arora, L., & Narula, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01932 · Cited by 367
Efficient Virus-Mediated Genome Editing in Plants Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System
Ali, Z., Abul-faraj, A., Li, L., Ghosh, N., Piatek, M., Mahjoub, A., Aouida, M., Piatek, A., Baltes, N. J., Voytas, D. F., et al. (2015) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2015.02.011 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Puchta, H., & Fauser, F.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11-05
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 727-741
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2132188193
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tpj.12338
- The paper
- Puchta, H., & Fauser, F. (2014). Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
